A viral claim from Jerusalem alleging that an ancient blood relic linked to Jesus was tested in an Israeli lab and found to be “still alive” has shocked the public, triggered fierce debate between faith and science, and ultimately led scientists and officials to firmly reject the claim as biologically impossible, leaving behind a mix of awe, controversy, and deep skepticism.

Jerusalem was thrust into the global spotlight this week after a viral video and accompanying online episode claimed that a sample identified as “the Blood of Jesus” had been tested in an Israeli laboratory and found to be “still alive,” a phrase that immediately ignited intense public reaction, theological debate, and sharp scientific pushback.

The claim, dramatic in both tone and implication, spread rapidly across social media platforms within hours of its release, drawing millions of views and prompting urgent responses from religious scholars, laboratory scientists, and Israeli officials seeking to clarify what actually took place.

According to the episode’s narration, the alleged blood sample was linked to a relic long venerated by a small Christian community, said to have been preserved for centuries and recently submitted for testing in Israel in late May 2026.

The video describes the testing as having occurred in a private laboratory in the greater Jerusalem area, with unnamed technicians reportedly observing “abnormal biological behavior” during analysis.

“We expected degraded material,” the narrator claims, “but what we saw challenged everything we know about death.

” At one point, the episode quotes an unidentified lab worker as saying, “This sample behaves as if it does not follow normal biological rules.”

The video stops short of naming the laboratory, the scientists involved, or providing documentation of test results, but it asserts that preliminary findings showed “living white blood cells without a complete human genome,” a statement that has become the focal point of controversy.

Within hours, Israeli social media was flooded with reactions ranging from awe to alarm.

“If this is true, it changes history,” one Jerusalem resident said in a street interview included in the episode.

Another responded more cautiously: “Israel is a land of archaeology and faith, but also of science.

Extraordinary claims demand extraordinary proof.”

Scientists were quick to respond.

By the following morning, several Israeli molecular biologists and hematologists publicly rejected the claim, calling it biologically impossible under known scientific laws.

Dr.Eyal Rosen, a hematology researcher based in Tel Aviv, explained in a televised interview that blood cells cannot remain viable for more than days under controlled conditions, let alone centuries.

“There is no mechanism by which blood could remain ‘alive’ for two thousand years,” he said.

“If any cells were observed, they would be modern contaminants.

Claims of missing chromosomes or ‘non-human behavior’ are common in pseudoscientific narratives but have no basis in peer-reviewed research.”

Religious authorities also urged restraint.

A spokesperson for the Latin Patriarchate of Jerusalem stated that the Church had no involvement in the testing and does not recognize any authenticated physical blood relic of Jesus subjected to modern laboratory analysis.

“Faith does not require laboratory proof,” the statement read.

“When such claims arise, they should be approached with humility and discernment, not sensationalism.

” Several theologians noted that similar stories have surfaced repeatedly over the past decades, often tied to alleged relics, and have consistently failed under independent verification.

Israeli officials, meanwhile, denied any state-sponsored involvement.

The Ministry of Health confirmed that no government laboratory had conducted or approved tests on ancient biological material connected to religious relics in recent months.

“Any laboratory operating under Israeli regulation would be required to document procedures, personnel, and chain of custody,” a ministry representative said.

“No such records exist.”

Despite the denials, the story continues to gain traction, fueled by emotional language and imagery in the episode itself.

The video’s closing line, “What if death could not hold Him?” has been widely shared, particularly among religious audiences, while skeptics point out that the absence of names, dates, and verifiable data mirrors previous viral hoaxes.

Historians also emphasized that there is no documented physical blood sample traceable to Jesus of Nazareth, whose crucifixion occurred around 30–33 CE, making any claim of direct biological testing historically implausible.

As of now, no physical evidence has been produced for independent examination, and no scientific paper has been submitted or published.

What remains is a powerful narrative colliding with scientific reality, unfolding in a region where faith and history carry immense emotional weight.

Whether viewed as a profound mystery, a modern myth, or a calculated provocation, the claim has once again demonstrated how quickly belief-driven stories can cross borders, unsettle audiences, and blur the line between faith, fiction, and fact in the digital age.