A viral episode claiming that an alleged blood relic of Jesus was tested in a Jerusalem lab and found to be “still alive” shocked audiences worldwide, but the lack of evidence and swift denials from scientists, religious authorities, and Israeli officials ultimately exposed the story as a powerful collision of faith, misinformation, and human longing for miracles.

Jerusalem became the center of global attention this week after a viral episode claimed that a blood sample believed to be linked to Jesus Christ had been tested in an Israeli laboratory and showed signs of being “still alive,” a phrase that instantly set off waves of astonishment, outrage, and disbelief across religious and scientific communities.

The claim, first circulated online late Sunday evening, spread rapidly within hours, drawing millions of views and triggering urgent responses from scientists, theologians, and Israeli authorities seeking to contain what many described as a dangerous mixture of faith, speculation, and misinformation.

According to the episode’s narration, the alleged blood sample was associated with a relic preserved by a small Christian group and transported to Israel for analysis in early June 2026.

The video asserts that testing took place in a private laboratory near Jerusalem, where technicians reportedly expected to find only degraded organic residue.

Instead, the narrator claims, the lab observed “cellular activity inconsistent with ancient biological material.

” One dramatic line from the episode quotes an unnamed technician saying, “This blood does not behave like something that should be dead.

It reacts.

” The statement, though unverifiable, became the most widely shared clip from the broadcast.

The video further alleges that preliminary analysis revealed the presence of intact white blood cells without a complete human chromosomal structure, a claim framed as both a scientific anomaly and a theological shock.

“If verified, this would rewrite both medicine and history,” the narrator declares, before urging viewers to “watch the full episode before it disappears.

” Within Israel, the reaction was immediate.

In Jerusalem’s Old City, pilgrims gathered in small groups discussing the rumor, while local residents expressed concern.

“This land carries enough sacred history already,” said David Cohen, a shop owner near Jaffa Gate.

“We don’t need internet miracles adding fuel to the fire.”

Scientists moved quickly to address the claims.

By Monday morning, several Israeli hematologists and molecular biologists publicly dismissed the story as biologically impossible.

Dr.Amir Levin, a biomedical researcher based in Tel Aviv, stated in an interview that blood cells cannot survive beyond days without highly controlled conditions.

“There is no known mechanism by which blood could remain viable for centuries,” he said.

“Any observed cellular activity would almost certainly be modern contamination or misinterpretation.

Claims of missing chromosomes or ‘non-human’ blood behavior are hallmarks of pseudoscience.

” He added bluntly, “Extraordinary claims require data, not drama.”

Religious authorities also urged caution.

A representative of the Latin Patriarchate of Jerusalem confirmed that the Church had no involvement in any laboratory testing and does not recognize any authenticated blood relic of Jesus subjected to modern scientific analysis.

“Christian faith does not rest on laboratory results,” the statement said.

“When such claims arise, they must be approached with discernment and responsibility, not sensational storytelling.

” Several theologians noted that similar stories have surfaced periodically over the past century, often centered on alleged relics, and have consistently collapsed under independent examination.

Israeli officials echoed the denials.

The Ministry of Health stated that no government-regulated laboratory had conducted tests on ancient biological material tied to religious relics in recent months.

“Any authorized testing would require documented approval, ethical review, and a clear chain of custody,” a ministry spokesperson said.

“No such documentation exists.

” The spokesperson emphasized that Israel’s scientific institutions adhere strictly to international research standards and warned the public against confusing viral content with verified research.

Historians also weighed in, pointing out that there is no credible historical record of any preserved physical blood sample directly traceable to Jesus of Nazareth, who was crucified around 30–33 CE.

“The idea that such a sample could exist, be preserved, and then quietly tested two thousand years later defies both history and archaeology,” said one Jerusalem-based historian.

“What we are seeing is a modern myth shaped for the digital age.”

Despite the growing list of denials, the episode continues to circulate widely, fueled by emotional language and carefully edited visuals.

Comments range from declarations of divine proof to accusations of blasphemy and fraud.

For some viewers, the claim offers hope and wonder; for others, it represents a troubling exploitation of belief.

As one Israeli university student put it, “People want miracles so badly that they stop asking who benefits from the story.”

As no physical evidence has been released and no scientific report has been submitted for peer review, the claim remains unverified and widely rejected by experts.

Yet the controversy itself has already left its mark, revealing how quickly faith-based narratives can collide with science in a media landscape driven by shock and clicks.

In the end, the story of the “living blood” says less about biology and more about humanity’s enduring hunger for mystery, meaning, and miracles in an age where belief travels faster than proof.