Stefanski in Full Panic Mode: Browns Axe Entire Offensive Line After ‘Sabotaging’ Shedeur Sanders — ‘When You Set Him Up to Fail, Don’t Act Surprised When He Falls’

Kevin Stefanski’s position as head coach of the Cleveland Browns is rapidly unraveling amid a storm of criticism over his handling of rookie quarterback Shedeur Sanders.

In a shocking development, the Browns have terminated the contracts of the entire offensive line that played with Sanders during the last preseason game.

This drastic move has been widely interpreted as an admission that poor line play contributed significantly to Sanders’ struggles — struggles many now believe were exacerbated, if not caused, by Stefanski’s questionable decisions.

Stefanski himself appears rattled.

In recent statements, he has attempted to downplay external pressures but his shaky voice and defensive tone betray a man under siege.

“I’m committed to his development just like all of our rookies,” Stefanski said, trying to reassure fans and media alike.

But the damage seems done.

The controversy centers on how Stefanski managed Sanders’ playing time and support.

Fans and insiders alike point to a glaring lack of trust and investment in Sanders’ success.

Notably, Stefanski pulled Sanders from the field before a critical two-minute drill, replacing him with Tyler Huntley — an emergency backup signed due to injuries, with no real future on the roster.

TJ Houshmandzade, a former Browns player and vocal critic, did not mince words.

“I’ve never seen a coach so uninterested in a player’s success,” TJ said, suggesting that Stefanski’s bias against Sanders is both obvious and damaging.

“It’s almost like he doesn’t want Shadur to do well,” TJ added, warning that if this perception persists, the Browns will have no choice but to remove Stefanski.

The fan base has rallied behind Sanders, demanding he be the starting quarterback for Week One.

“Shadur should be our guy,” chants echo from the stands and social media alike, a stark contrast to Stefanski’s apparent sidelining of the young talent.

This isn’t the first time Stefanski’s treatment of Sanders has raised eyebrows.

Despite Sanders’ flawless performance in the first preseason game, Stefanski refused to acknowledge his success, offering only vague remarks about developing all quarterbacks equally.

This pattern of neglect has fueled suspicions that Sanders was set up to fail from the very beginning.

Analysts like Oo Sinko have highlighted the poor offensive support Sanders received, arguing that even a quarterback of Tom Brady’s caliber would have struggled under similar conditions.

Oo warned that Browns-paid critics might soon label Sanders a failure, dismissing him as a fifth-string quarterback, while ignoring the real culprit — Stefanski’s poor coaching choices.

The Browns’ decision to release the entire offensive line that played with Sanders sends a strong message: the organization acknowledges the unit’s failure but also raises questions about why these players were on the field in the first place.

The move is seen by many as a desperate attempt to shift blame away from the coaching staff.

Skip Bayless joined the chorus of condemnation, calling the Browns’ approach “the worst possible way to manage a player.”

According to Skip, the mishandling of Sanders is not an isolated incident but a systemic problem that has made it nearly impossible for the rookie to thrive.

Stefanski’s body language during press conferences reveals a man under immense pressure.

His attempts to justify his decisions come across as defensive and uncertain, a far cry from the confident leader the Browns hired.

Journalists and former players have also weighed in, with Steven A. Smith famously asserting early on that the Browns were “setting up Shadur Sanders for failure.”

This statement has only gained weight as the saga unfolds.

G Bush highlighted Sanders’ relentless work ethic, noting how the young quarterback arrived early to practice and stayed late to improve, only to be met with indifference from the coaching staff.

Fans now openly call for Stefanski’s resignation, frustrated by what they see as a deliberate attempt to derail a promising career.

The Browns now face a pivotal moment.

Will they back a coach whose decisions have alienated fans and stifled talent, or will they make a bold move to protect their future and give Sanders the opportunity he deserves?

This controversy is about more than football.

It’s a lesson in leadership, fairness, and accountability.

When a coach appears to sabotage a player rather than support him, the entire organization suffers.

Shedeur Sanders’ resilience is undeniable, but even the strongest player can’t thrive in a system stacked against him.

The Browns’ next moves will determine whether this story ends in redemption or regret.