Imagine standing before the Shroud of Turin, a relic that has sparked centuries of debate.

Recently, actor Jonathan Roumie, known for portraying Jesus in The Chosen, made a shocking statement: the imprint on the Shroud is not from this planet.

He argued that the image on the Shroud isn’t just a symbol—it’s something that defies explanation, potentially representing a divine, cosmic event.

Roumie’s startling revelation is based on his in-depth study of the Shroud, a study that he believes has radically changed how we understand Jesus, the Resurrection, and the power of the image itself.

thumbnail

The Shroud’s Origins and Modern Discoveries

For centuries, the Shroud of Turin has been regarded as a relic containing the image of Jesus Christ’s face, his wounds, and his blood.

Many people, including scholars and skeptics, have debated its authenticity.

Some argue it’s a medieval forgery; others maintain it’s the true burial cloth of Jesus.

What’s not disputed is the scientific mystery surrounding it: How did such a detailed, life-like image appear on a piece of cloth without the use of paints or pigments?

The blood on the Shroud has been analyzed repeatedly, with scientists confirming it’s human blood—specifically Type AB blood, which is rare and most commonly found in the land of Israel.

This, Roumie points out, aligns with historical records and supports the idea that the Shroud is not only authentic but profoundly tied to the events of Jesus’s death and resurrection.

Roumie’s conclusion? The image may have been created by “resurrection light,” a concept suggesting that the moment of Christ’s resurrection left a lasting imprint on the fabric—a force beyond anything the scientific community has fully explained.

thumbnail

AI Reconstructions and The Shroud’s Mystical Power

AI technology has recently been used to reconstruct what Jesus might have looked like based on the Shroud and other ancient relics.

The results are startling: a Semitic man, consistent with modern reconstructions of first-century Jews, not the “effeminate” figure often portrayed in medieval Christian art.

Roumie argues that this image of Jesus, reconstructed from historical data and modern technology, is a closer match to the reality of the time and place where Jesus lived.

But what makes the Shroud so unique is not just the image, but the mystery of how it came to be.

Roumie refers to the image as something beyond art.

He believes it’s a moment captured in time—a divine imprint that reflects the suffering and resurrection of Jesus.

The key to understanding this, Roumie says, lies in how the image is “raised” on the cloth, unlike traditional art.

The imprint is not just visible—it’s physically etched, a feature that’s been compared to the atomic-level effects of nuclear exposure, like the shadows left on surfaces after the atomic bombings in Japan.

Researchers find oldest written claim that the Shroud of Turin was faked |  CNN

The 1988 Carbon Dating Controversy

One of the most famous tests conducted on the Shroud of Turin was the 1988 carbon dating, which concluded that the cloth was from the medieval period—between 1260 and 1380.

This discovery led to headlines proclaiming the Shroud was a fake.

However, Roumie reveals a crucial detail: the sample used for carbon dating was taken from a patch on the Shroud, not the original linen.

This patch was added after a fire in the 1500s, which explains why the test results were inaccurate.

Barry Schwarz, one of the leading scientists involved in the original Shroud research, started as a skeptic but became a believer after discovering this critical error.

Schwarz, a Jewish atheist at the time, eventually concluded that the Shroud was genuine and that the scientific evidence pointed toward it being the burial cloth of Jesus Christ.

The Resurrection Light: A Divine Mystery

The Shroud’s scientific analysis also revealed an intriguing detail: the image on the cloth could not have been created by any known method in the 14th century or earlier.

The image on the Shroud is unlike any traditional painting or image—there’s no trace of pigment, only a subtle, energy-based imprint.

Roumie likens this to the “resurrection light,” suggesting that the image was burned into the cloth by a supernatural force at the moment of Christ’s resurrection, a force that defies explanation by conventional science.

Is the Turin Shroud a genuine relic or just an elaborate fake? New  investigation reopens the debate among historians - so, was the cloth  really used to wrap the body of Jesus

New Research: The Case for Authenticity

Recent research on the Shroud has revealed even more compelling evidence.

Scientists have used advanced techniques such as wide-angle X-ray scattering (WEX) to assess the Shroud’s age.

This method showed evidence of 2,000 years of wear and tear, not the 700 years previously suggested by critics.

Researchers also found that the pollen on the Shroud matched plants native to Jerusalem during the time of Christ, which further supports its authenticity.

This level of specificity is virtually impossible for a medieval forger to have replicated.

The Shroud’s blood stains, which correspond with the Biblical account of Christ’s suffering, have been analyzed, confirming the presence of male blood with human chromosomes.

The nail marks, the crown of thorns—these details match the Roman method of crucifixion described in the New Testament.

The Final Mystery: What Happens Next?

The Shroud of Turin is still one of the most controversial and closely studied relics in the world.

As new technology uncovers more details about the Shroud, it continues to captivate the imagination of both scientists and believers.

Jonathan Roumie’s study of the Shroud has left him convinced that it is not just an artifact but a direct connection to the divine—an image that speaks to the resurrection of Jesus and the power of his suffering.

For many, the Shroud is a tangible link to the events of Christ’s life, death, and resurrection.

It is a powerful reminder of the mystery of faith, one that continues to stir both awe and skepticism.

Roumie’s exploration of the Shroud challenges us to rethink its significance and what it tells us about the intersection of science, religion, and history.

Whether you view it as a divine relic or a fascinating historical artifact, the Shroud of Turin remains an enigma that will continue to intrigue and inspire.