😱 Dillon Brooks PROVES Kenyon Martin DESTROYED Draymond Green With This… 😱

Dillon Brooks’ recent season has sparked a fascinating conversation about player roles and expectations in the NBA, especially when compared to Draymond Green’s tenure with the Golden State Warriors.

Kenyan Martin, a former NBA player himself, recently weighed in on a live stream, sparking renewed scrutiny of Green’s offensive production during a period when the Warriors’ stars, including Steph Curry and Klay Thompson, suffered injuries.

Draymond Green was expected to shoulder a heavier offensive load during those injury-plagued stretches.

The anticipation was that he might increase his scoring average to around 18 or even 20 points per game, particularly if he were playing on a different team like Charlotte, where he could have been the primary offensive option.

However, Martin and others argue that Green’s skill set doesn’t align with that expectation.

To understand this better, it’s important to look at the numbers.

Steph Curry, widely regarded as the greatest shooter and one of the best point guards in NBA history, has a winning record even in games played without Draymond.

Specifically, the Warriors went 53-38 in games where Curry played but Green did not.

Conversely, when Curry was absent, the Warriors struggled significantly, posting a 52-76 record in 128 games without their star point guard.

This raises a critical question: who truly needs whom? The Warriors’ struggles without Curry suggest that Green’s ability to carry the offense may be overstated.

In fact, during those same games without Curry, Green’s shooting efficiency was underwhelming—41% from the field and 29% from three-point range.

Kenyan Martin’s pointed remarks highlight this inefficiency, suggesting that Green was not stepping up offensively in the way the team needed.

Contrast this with Dillon Brooks, who has had to elevate his game significantly for the Phoenix Suns this season.

Brooks is averaging a career-high 22.

3 points per game on an efficient 46% shooting from the field.

Unlike Green, Brooks is tasked with being both a defensive stopper and a primary offensive option, especially when Devin Booker is injured or unavailable.

His ability to increase his scoring output while maintaining defensive intensity is a testament to his work ethic and adaptability.

Brooks’ journey is a clear example of a player who has had to “get it out the mud,” as Martin put it.

Unlike Green, who has played alongside some of the greatest shooters and offensive talents in NBA history—Steph Curry, Klay Thompson, and Kevin Durant—Brooks has had to carve out his role in a team that relies heavily on him to create offense.

Kenyan Martin’s critique isn’t meant to diminish Green’s value as a defensive anchor and playmaker but rather to highlight the difference in offensive production when a player is asked to carry more responsibility.

While Green’s role in Golden State is vital, it is also specialized.

He often thrives as a facilitator, defender, and energy player rather than a primary scorer.

This discussion also touches on the broader NBA landscape, where many players are stepping up offensively in the absence of superstars.

Brooks is just one example among several who have expanded their offensive game to keep their teams competitive.

The implication is that Green’s limitations as a scorer become more apparent when compared to players who must consistently produce points to keep their teams afloat.

Moreover, the Warriors’ unique roster construction—with two of the greatest shooters in NBA history—allows Green to focus on other aspects of the game.

His responsibilities often include setting screens, making smart passes, and playing tough defense rather than chasing high scoring averages.

This dynamic explains why Green’s scoring numbers might not match those of players like Brooks, who do not have the luxury of such offensive firepower around them.

The debate ultimately revolves around expectations and context.

Draymond Green is an indispensable part of the Warriors’ success, but his role is not that of a primary scorer.

Meanwhile, Dillon Brooks exemplifies a player who has risen to the occasion offensively and defensively when his team needed him most.

As the NBA evolves, the ability to adapt and expand one’s game becomes crucial.

Brooks’ current season is a reminder that some players must do more to carry their teams, especially when star players are sidelined.

Kenyan Martin’s comments serve as a call to recognize the different demands placed on players depending on their team’s structure and the presence of other stars.

In conclusion, the comparison between Draymond Green and Dillon Brooks is less about who is better and more about understanding the roles and expectations each player faces.

Green excels in a system built around elite shooters and playmakers, while Brooks has proven his ability to elevate his scoring and defense in a less star-studded environment.

This nuanced perspective encourages fans and analysts alike to appreciate the complexities of team dynamics and player responsibilities.

It also underscores the importance of context when evaluating player performance and contributions to their teams’ success.