Taylor Sheridan’s New Series “Landman” Marks a Radical Shift — The Anti-Yellowstone Era Begins

As fans eagerly await the final chapter of Yellowstone, creator Taylor Sheridan seems to be riding off in a completely new direction — and not on horseback this time.

Instead of returning to the rugged ranches and generational conflicts of Montana, Sheridan is digging deep into the oil fields of Texas with his new series, Landman.

But what’s truly shocking is that Landman isn’t just another Western — it’s being called the anti-Yellowstone.

The revelation has left fans wondering: is Sheridan turning his back on the very world that made him a television powerhouse? Or is this bold creative pivot his next great frontier?

For years, Taylor Sheridan has been synonymous with the modern Western.

Through Yellowstone and its spin-offs — 1883, 1923, and the upcoming 1944 — he redefined American television, creating sprawling family dramas set against the breathtaking, brutal beauty of the frontier.

But with Landman, Sheridan appears ready to trade cattle for crude oil, horses for helicopters, and the Dutton family legacy for a modern tale of greed, power, and survival in the oil business.

Based on the Boomtown podcast, Landman centers around the chaotic and cutthroat world of Texas oil speculation.

It follows the people who acquire mineral rights, strike deals, and gamble fortunes on black gold — a story that feels less like a Western and more like a capitalist chess match.

Jon Hamm, who stars as Monty Miller, described the show as “the furthest thing from Yellowstone.

” Speaking about the project, Hamm explained, “It’s not cowboy-oriented at all.

It’s more in the world of oil.

It’s about the guys who run around trying to acquire land rights and mineral rights — and all the political things that come with that.”

That one quote alone marks a seismic creative shift for Sheridan.

While Yellowstone explored the emotional and moral complexities of family, legacy, and land ownership in rural America, Landman looks to dissect the high-stakes corporate world that fuels modern life — literally.

Oil, not livestock, drives this new story, and with it comes a different breed of drama.

There’s no cowboy code here, no ranch to defend, no ancient bloodlines to preserve.

Instead, Landman dives into moral gray zones shaped by profit, politics, and environmental conflict.

It’s a distinctly 21st-century frontier — and one that feels far removed from the romanticized struggles of John Dutton and his Montana dynasty.

Yet, even with this radical new focus, Landman still bears Sheridan’s signature DNA: power, loyalty, betrayal, and the unrelenting American drive to control land.

The cast of Landman reads like a list of Hollywood heavyweights.

In addition to Jon Hamm, Academy Award-winner Billy Bob Thornton takes on a major role, returning to the Sheridan universe after his standout performance in 1883.

The combination of Hamm and Thornton hints that Landman will deliver a mix of prestige drama and moral tension.

According to Hamm, the writing is sharp and the story “very well told,” adding, “There’s a lot of back-and-forth, a lot of intrigue.

It’s an interesting take on how we get the stuff that makes our cars and our lives go.”

For Sheridan, whose work often celebrates the mythology of American identity, this represents a fascinating evolution.

Where Yellowstone mythologized ranchers, Landman might do the same for oil tycoons — only this time, the heroes and villains could be harder to tell apart.

Despite the excitement surrounding Landman, not all fans are thrilled.

Many feel Sheridan’s growing empire — which already includes Mayor of Kingstown, Tulsa King, and Special Ops: Lioness — has come at the expense of Yellowstone’s conclusion.

Since Kevin Costner’s exit and the delays in Yellowstone Season 5B, viewers have voiced frustration online, accusing Sheridan of abandoning the flagship series that made him famous.

Some even see Landman as a distraction, or worse, a replacement.

“I’m lowkey angry at the show for stealing Sheridan’s attention from Yellowstone,” one fan confessed in a viral Reddit post.

“It’s like he’s ready to move on before giving us the ending we deserve.”

That sentiment reflects a growing unease among fans who fear Yellowstone’s legacy will fade as Sheridan turns his creative gaze elsewhere.

It’s no secret that Taylor Sheridan is one of Hollywood’s busiest showrunners.

At Paramount alone, he reportedly has ten projects in development.

From 1883 and 1923 to Tulsa King and Lioness, Sheridan has built an entire storytelling empire — an interconnected world of American power, violence, and ambition.

Yet, Landman represents something new: a break from the “Yellowstone formula.

” It’s not a prequel, not a sequel, and not another Dutton drama.

It’s a bold attempt to explore the American dream in a completely different context — through the lens of the oil boom that fuels both progress and destruction.

As Hamm put it, “It’s a story very well told, and I think it’s an interesting take on how we get the stuff that makes our lives go.”

It’s a line that captures what might be Sheridan’s new obsession — not just the beauty of the land, but the cost of what we take from it.

For all its differences, Landman may still feel like a spiritual sibling to Yellowstone — both stories about American ambition colliding with moral consequence.

Sheridan’s knack for portraying flawed men wrestling with power, greed, and redemption remains intact.

But make no mistake: Landman marks the end of an era.

It’s a symbolic farewell to the open-range mythology that made Yellowstone iconic.

In its place comes a sharper, more modern drama — one that trades cattle herds for corporate deals and gunfights for boardroom battles.

As Landman heads toward release on Paramount+ in 2024, fans face a bittersweet reality.

The world of Yellowstone may be drawing to a close, but Taylor Sheridan’s storytelling frontier is just beginning to expand — into oil fields, politics, and perhaps even darker corners of the American dream.

Whether audiences embrace this “anti-Yellowstone” remains to be seen.

But if Sheridan’s track record tells us anything, he’s not afraid to burn down his own empire just to build another one.