July 23 (Reuters) – Pop star Madonna and an arena owner have asked a U.S. judge to dismiss a proposed class action that accused the singer of duping fans when she started a pair of concerts two hours late in Washington, D.C. last year.

Singer Madonna performs during her concert at the AccorHotels Arena in Paris, France, December 9, 2015, on her Rebel Heart Tour. REUTERS/Benoit Tessier/File Photo Purchase Licensing Rights, opens new tab
Madonna and the owner of Capital One Arena said in a filing in Washington federal court late on Monday that they did not deceive fans by advertising an 8:30 p.m. start time for the downtown D.C. shows.
“Reasonable concertgoers — and certainly Madonna fans — do not expect the headline act at a major arena concert to take the stage at the ticketed event time,” Madonna told the court. Live concerts often feature one or more opening acts before the main event, the filing said.
The plaintiffs’ lawyers and attorneys for Madonna and Capital One Arena did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
The litigation mirrors an earlier case in New York federal court that accused Madonna and tour promoter Live Nation of duping fans over concert start times.
Live Nation and its subsidiary Ticketmaster are not defendants in the Washington lawsuit.
The plaintiffs in the New York case, represented by one of the same attorneys in the D.C. lawsuit, withdrew their complaint in June amid claims from Madonna that they were trying to pressure her into a settlement.
The three plaintiffs in the D.C. lawsuit said they had to leave the December 2023 concerts at Capital One Arena before they ended because Madonna didn’t take the stage until 10:30. They also complained that the venue was hot, and that Madonna did not actually sing for parts of her performance.
“In essence, Madonna and Live Nation are a consumer’s worst nightmare,” the lawsuit said.
Madonna denied the plaintiffs’ lip-syncing claim and said they presented no evidence to back it up. Even if they had evidence, she said, it would not be enough to sustain a consumer deception lawsuit.
“If a performer misses a note or a cue, that may lead to some fleeting disappointment, but not a legally cognizable injury,” Madonna told the court.
The case is Elizabeth Halper-Asefi v. Madonna Louise Ciccone et al, U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, No. 1:24-cv-01118-RC.
For plaintiffs: Marcus Corwin of Corwin Law, and David Greenbaum of Schwartz & Greenbaum
For defendants: Sandra Crawshaw-Sparks, David Munkittrick and Jeffrey Warshafsky of Proskauer Rose
News
O.J.’s Daughter Finally CONFIRMS The Awful Truth — ‘What I’ve Kept Secret for Years’
Sydney Brook Simpson Finally Confirms the Awful Truth About Her Father, O.J. Simpso For over three decades, Sydney Brook Simpson lived under…
At 85, Errol Flynn’s Widow FINALLY CONFIRMS What We All DENIED — ‘The Truth Has Been Hidden For Too Long’
The Shocking Truth About Errol Flynn Finally Exposed by His Widow Patrice Wymore—A Legacy Rewritten For over half a century,…
30 Years Later, Bill Wyman Finally Admits Why He Couldn’t Stand Keith Richards — ‘It Was More Than Just Personal Differences’
Bill Wyman Finally Reveals Why He Couldn’t Stand Keith Richards: The Untold Truth Behind His Departure from The Rolling Stones…
Remember Her? She Left Hollywood 31 Years Ago, Now We Know Why — The Shocking Reason She Disappeared!
“Christy McNichol’s Shocking Life After Hollywood: The Untold Truth Behind Her Exit and Transformation” The world once knew Christy McNichol…
At 71, John Travolta Finally Reveals What We All Suspected — ‘It’s Time to Tell the Truth’
The Hidden Struggles and Triumphs of John Travolta: A Legend’s Fight for Survival At 71, John Travolta—the iconic star who…
Sam Elliott Breaks His Silence on 1989 Episode He Refuses to Watch — ‘The Memory Is Too Painful’
Sam Elliott Finally Reveals Why He Refuses to Watch That 1989 Episode — A Deeply Personal Story Sam Elliott,…
End of content
No more pages to load






