“🍨 The Ice Cream That Broke the Internet: Why Baskin Robbins’ Sydney Sweeney Scoop Sparked OUTRAGE 😱”

When Baskin Robbins announced their latest limited-edition flavor — “Sweeney Sweet Cream” — inspired by Euphoria star and rising Hollywood It-Girl Sydney Sweeney, the company expected lines out the door.

Instead, they got a PR nightmare.

At first glance, the rollout looked like a textbook success.

A pastel pink container.

An Instagram-perfect promotional shoot.

A dreamy blend of white chocolate chunks, soft raspberry swirl, and a hint of rose — meant to reflect Sydney’s “soft yet edgy” persona.

But the moment the press release hit the internet, the backlash began to churn, faster than any ice cream machine in the back of a Baskin Robbins.

It started small.

A few murmurs on Reddit.

A tweet or two calling the campaign “tone-deaf.

” But within 24 hours, #BoycottBaskinRobbins was trending on X (formerly Twitter).

And the reasons people were angry? Complex.

Layered.

And — much like the ice cream itself — not what anyone expected.

Some critics took issue with the timing.

The launch came just days after Sydney Sweeney made headlines for attending a controversial political fundraiser.

Photos had surfaced of the actress laughing with known conservative donors — a move that fractured her fanbase, especially among younger, progressive viewers who had embraced her role in Euphoria as a symbol of female complexity and rebellion.

“So now we’re glamorizing a woman who platforms anti-LGBTQ+ voices?” one TikTok user said in a video that racked up over 1.2 million views.

“And Baskin Robbins is just gonna act like that’s sweet and fun? Nah.

Others took issue with the flavor itself.

“Why does this taste like perfume and sugar-free guilt?” one viral review declared.

Some even accused the company of creating a “feminine-coded” flavor that leaned too heavily into stereotypes — with one popular Instagram Reel declaring, “It’s giving 1950s housewife in a cone.

But the real plot twist came when fans dug deeper into the marketing materials.

A now-deleted behind-the-scenes video featured a Baskin Robbins executive saying the flavor was meant to “capture the purity and sweetness of Sydney’s image.

” That one word — purity — set off a firestorm.

“This is so disturbing,” a viral tweet read.

“They’re literally selling an image of virginity and white femininity for profit.

Sydney Sweeney has become a brand, not a person.

Suddenly, this wasn’t about ice cream anymore.

It was about identity.

Representation.

Commercialization of celebrity personas.

A cold dessert had turned into a cultural flashpoint.

Sydney Sweeney, for her part, has remained almost completely silent.

Her reps declined requests for comment.

Her Instagram feed, usually filled with daily updates, has gone eerily quiet.

No Stories.

No Likes.

Just a faint echo of pastel pink photos from the original campaign — now flooded with angry comments.

“This aged like spoiled milk,” wrote one user.

“Unfollowed.

”

The silence has only made things worse.

In the absence of a statement, fans and critics alike are drawing their own conclusions.

Was she aware of the campaign’s tone? Did she approve the messaging? Or was she blindsided, another celebrity pawn in a brand’s attempt to cash in on controversy?

One marketing insider, speaking anonymously, hinted that the campaign had been rushed.

“They wanted to capitalize on Sydney’s buzz after her last movie.

But there were internal concerns about the timing, especially after that fundraiser photo went viral.

This flavor was supposed to launch next month.

They pushed it forward.

Now they’re regretting it.

Even Baskin Robbins’ social media team seems to be scrambling.

The original announcement post, once pinned to the top of their Instagram page, has been quietly unpinned.

Comments have been limited.

Customer service DMs are reportedly being flooded with refund requests and complaints.

Despite the backlash, some fans have come to Sydney’s defense.

“People are so quick to cancel,” one fan wrote.

“It’s just ice cream.

” But even they admit — the optics are bad.

Very bad.

And this isn’t the first time a brand has stumbled into the minefield of influencer marketing.

Last year, another dessert brand faced backlash for partnering with a reality star embroiled in scandal.

That controversy died down within weeks.

But this? This feels different.

There’s a discomfort that lingers in every bite.

A creeping unease that what you’re consuming is more than just dessert — it’s the image of a woman being reduced to a flavor.

It’s a reminder that in 2025, even your ice cream comes with a political and moral price tag.

And for Baskin Robbins, that price might be steeper than they expected.

As for Sydney Sweeney? Her silence speaks volumes.

Maybe she’s waiting for the storm to pass.

Maybe she’s crafting the perfect apology.

Or maybe — just maybe — she’s realizing that even the sweetest deals can leave a bitter aftertaste.