The Greatest Song Heist Ever?  George Harrison’s My Sweet Lord and the $1.5 Million Secret That Shook Music Forever!

When George Harrison wrote My Sweet Lord, he believed he was crafting a hymn to peace, love, and spirituality.

But what began as a divine revelation soon descended into one of the most infamous lawsuits in music history.

The song that topped charts worldwide was suddenly accused of theft — a haunting echo of another tune, He’s So Fine.

What followed was a courtroom war that shattered reputations, destroyed trust, and exposed the dark truth about the fine line between creativity and crime.

Was it a coincidence, or did the quiet Beatle unconsciously steal a song from someone else’s soul?

In 1970, George Harrison was finally free. The Beatles had just imploded under the weight of fame, egos, and exhaustion.

For the first time in years, he wasn’t “the quiet Beatle” anymore — he was simply George.

While Lennon and McCartney were busy nursing creative wounds, Harrison was searching for something deeper.

Meditation, mantras, and Indian philosophy had given him a new purpose: to write a song that could bridge heaven and earth. That song was My Sweet Lord.

It wasn’t just another pop single. It was a spiritual cry — a prayer disguised as melody. “I wanted to make God an everyday experience,” George later said.

“Something everyone could feel.” And for a brief moment, it worked. The song was a global phenomenon, topping charts across America, the UK, and beyond. But the higher it climbed, the closer it came to crashing down.

Because someone was listening closely — too closely.

In 1963, seven years before My Sweet Lord was born, a girl group called The Chiffons had a bubbly hit titled He’s So Fine.

It was catchy, innocent, and unmistakably ‘60s. But when listeners compared the two songs side by side, the similarity was undeniable.

The melody, the phrasing — even the rhythm — felt eerily familiar. What was once divine now sounded… borrowed.

In 1971, Bright Tunes Music, the company that owned He’s So Fine, filed a lawsuit against George Harrison. What followed was one of the most bizarre and defining copyright cases in modern history.

For years, the case dragged on — a painful, public dissection of how creativity works. In 1976, when it finally went to trial, the courtroom turned into a concert hall. Musicologists brought out charts, pianos, and guitars.

They played both songs, note by note, comparing melodies like detectives matching fingerprints. Harrison himself was asked to perform his song — in court.

“I had to stand there with my guitar while they grilled me,” he recalled later. “It was humiliating.”

Even his producer, Phil Spector, admitted that the two songs sounded nearly identical. Harrison didn’t deny it either.

He said the melody came to him naturally, in a flow — like a spiritual transmission. “I wasn’t consciously aware of the similarity,” he said. “It just came out that way.”

But the judge didn’t buy divine coincidence. His verdict became legendary: “Subconscious plagiarism is still plagiarism.”

George Harrison had, in the eyes of the law, stolen a song — not deliberately, but subconsciously. He was ordered to pay damages amounting to $1.5 million.

For an artist who prided himself on sincerity and spirituality, the blow was devastating.

But the story didn’t end there.

Behind the scenes, a darker twist was unfolding. The man who had been managing Harrison’s finances — Alan Klein — secretly purchased the rights to He’s So Fine in the middle of the lawsuit.

That meant George’s own manager was now suing him, using inside information from his private meetings to win the case.

It was betrayal at the deepest level. Klein, once hailed as the man who rescued The Beatles’ finances, was now seen as the vulture who tore them apart. When the truth surfaced, even the court was stunned.

The judge reduced Harrison’s payment to $587,000 — exactly what Klein had paid for the song.

Harrison eventually gained ownership of He’s So Fine, but the damage to his trust and faith in the music industry was irreversible.

After the case, Harrison became more withdrawn. The man who once believed in the purity of inspiration began questioning everything — his instincts, his art, even his spirituality.

“It made me doubt myself,” he admitted. “If something from your heart can still be called theft, then what’s left?”

But George wasn’t one to stay silent forever. In 1976, he released This Song — a satirical masterpiece poking fun at the entire ordeal. The lyrics were playful, mocking the absurdity of trying to label creativity as property.

The music video even featured comedic cameos, including Monty Python’s Eric Idle. It was Harrison’s way of laughing through the pain, of reclaiming his voice.

Yet beneath the humor was a haunting truth. The My Sweet Lord case changed everything. From that day on, artists became paranoid about the origins of their inspiration.

Songwriters began recording every writing session, every jam, just to prove originality later — something Ed Sheeran himself now does after facing similar lawsuits.

The ripple effects continue to this day. The “Blurred Lines” verdict, the Ed Sheeran vs. Marvin Gaye case — all trace their roots back to George Harrison’s trial.

It forced musicians and lawyers to ask impossible questions: Where does influence end and theft begin? Can we ever truly create something new, or are we all just echoing the sounds that came before us?

For George, the answer lay somewhere between faith and irony. He never stopped believing in the spiritual power of music.

But he learned the hard way that even purity can be weaponized. What he intended as a hymn became a headline. What began as devotion ended as litigation.

“My Sweet Lord,” the song that once united millions in transcendence, now symbolized the fragility of creativity itself — how easily a divine spark can become a legal nightmare.

And yet, decades later, when you listen to it — that shimmering slide guitar, that gentle chant of “Hallelujah” and “Hare Krishna” — it still feels holy.

Maybe because it reminds us that even in a world obsessed with ownership, art remains something larger than law.

So was it theft, or was it simply the most expensive coincidence in music history?

Maybe both. Maybe neither.

But one thing is certain: My Sweet Lord will forever stand as the song that proved inspiration can be both a blessing… and a curse.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.