The Cleveland Browns’ quarterback position has been a hot topic of discussion this NFL season, especially concerning third-round draft pick Dillon Gabriel.

Recently, local media voices have grown increasingly critical of Gabriel’s performance, signaling a possible shift in their stance as fans and analysts debate whether Shedeur Sanders, the team’s more recent quarterback acquisition, might be the better option going forward.

Dillon Gabriel entered the NFL with considerable promise.

He was a seasoned college quarterback with experience at multiple programs, having started 61 games and played in various offensive systems.

This versatility initially led many to believe he would adapt quickly to the professional level.

However, as the season unfolded, Gabriel struggled to meet expectations.

Local Browns media personalities have openly expressed frustration with Gabriel’s play.

One commentator bluntly stated, “His best is what a backup does,” underscoring the perception that Gabriel has plateaued at a level typical of a backup quarterback rather than a franchise leader.

Critics point to his conservative style—opting for checkdowns and short passes rather than pushing the ball downfield—as a significant limitation.

Statistical analysis supports these critiques.

Gabriel’s average depth of pass attempts in 2024 was among the lowest in the Football Bowl Subdivision (FBS), standing at just 7.0 yards.

His big-time throw rate—passes over 20 yards—was a mere 3. 2%, signaling a reluctance or inability to stretch the field vertically.

While his accuracy on these rare deep throws was excellent, the infrequency of such attempts has drawn concern.

The Browns’ local media discourse has increasingly framed Gabriel as a quintessential backup quarterback.

Analysts note that most offensive coordinators prefer quarterbacks who can reliably execute the offense without taking undue risks.

Gabriel’s style fits this mold: he plays within the system, avoids risky throws, and prioritizes ball security.

However, this approach also means he lacks the dynamic playmaking ability that can change games.

In contrast, Shedeur Sanders, a younger quarterback with a more aggressive mentality, has emerged as a potential alternative.

Media insiders highlight Sanders’ willingness to take risks and thread difficult throws, qualities that could energize the Browns’ stagnant offense.

One local analyst remarked that while Sanders might make mistakes, his higher ceiling and confidence could ultimately be more valuable than Gabriel’s cautious play.

Head coach Kevin Stefanski’s role in this quarterback saga is also under scrutiny.

Some media voices suggest Stefanski’s preference for a steady, system-oriented quarterback aligns with Gabriel’s style, which might explain why Gabriel has retained the starting job despite struggles.

Others argue that Stefanski’s hands may be tied by front office decisions or ownership preferences, particularly given the Browns’ recent investment in Sanders.

The Browns’ ownership, led by Jimmy Haslam, has reportedly been involved in quarterback decisions behind the scenes.

Speculation exists that Haslam’s influence might determine when or if Sanders gets a fair opportunity to start.

This dynamic adds complexity to the media narrative, as fans and commentators wonder whether the team is fully committed to evaluating its quarterbacks on merit alone.

The Browns’ offense has been underwhelming for much of the season, leading to growing impatience among fans and local media alike.

Calls for a change at quarterback have intensified, with many urging the team to give Sanders a chance to “light it up” and inject energy into the offense.

Social media and fan forums reflect this sentiment, with supporters expressing frustration over Gabriel’s perceived inability to make big plays or consistently move the chains.

The notion that Gabriel “turns down open field passing options” has become a common refrain, highlighting the desire for a more explosive and confident signal-caller.

Looking ahead, media insiders speculate that the Browns might finally give Sanders a starting opportunity around the team’s upcoming game against the Las Vegas Raiders.

This matchup is viewed as a relatively winnable game where Sanders could gain valuable experience without the intense pressure of facing a top-tier defense like Baltimore’s.

The timing of this potential quarterback switch is also linked to the team’s bye week and the remaining home games, which the Browns hope to sell out.

Sanders’ presence on the field is seen as a marketing advantage, capable of boosting ticket sales and fan excitement.

The Browns’ quarterback situation remains fluid and contentious.

Local media continue to debate Gabriel’s limitations versus Sanders’ potential.

While Gabriel’s experience and steady play make him a safe choice, Sanders’ risk-taking and playmaking ability offer hope for a more dynamic offense.

Ultimately, the Browns face a critical decision: stick with the known quantity in Gabriel and hope for incremental improvement, or embrace the uncertainty of Sanders and gamble on his upside.

This decision will have significant implications for the team’s competitive prospects and fan engagement.

The Cleveland Browns’ local media narrative around Dillon Gabriel has clearly shifted from cautious optimism to growing skepticism.

Gabriel’s conservative style and inconsistent play have led many to question his viability as a long-term starter.

Meanwhile, Shedeur Sanders’ arrival has sparked renewed hope for a more exciting and effective offense.

As the season progresses and the Browns approach key games, the quarterback battle will remain a focal point for media, fans, and the team’s leadership.

Whether Sanders gets his chance to prove himself or Gabriel holds on as the starter, the Browns’ quarterback saga is a defining storyline of their 2025 campaign.