Okay, you’re saying something that’s

actually factually inaccurate according

to the narrative. Now, let’s be real

clear. I don’t necessarily think they

know what’s going on yet. There’s a lot

of weird going on with

I almost texted you when the Charlie

Kirk thing happened because my my

antennas went up about they showed the

photo of that kid or the guy that they

have, the 22-year-old Yeah. whatever.

And I was almost going to be like,

“Dude, this kid had a rifle with a

scope.” Now, here’s where it gets weird.

The first images of this rifle with a

scope, I swear to God, it looks like he

has a composite stock on it. Like, it

looks like a like a modern 30 odd 6

rifle.

In a shocking twist, Joe Rogan has

publicly expressed doubts about the

official story surrounding the Charlie

Kirk incident. On his podcast, Rogan

admitted that he didn’t buy the official

story that was out there. He even went

as far as to say that there’s a lot of

weird SHAT going on. To add to the

drama, Joe highlighted a number of

unsettling details that were just not

adding up, including the presence of a

suspicious decoy suspect allegedly tied

to other criminal cases. According to

Rogan, these inconsistencies raise

serious questions about the events and

individuals involved. from the

capabilities of the alleged shooter to

the narrative surrounding the weapon

used. Adding fuel to the fire, new

rumors have begun circulating about

possible involvement from people close

to Kirk, including whispers about his

wife’s potential connection to the

unfolding drama. Guys, you’d better

buckle up because the drama I’m about to

spill for you is insane.

Of all, there was that one guy who is

the decoy. All right. So, you got this

guy who’s an older guy who starts

yelling out. Didn’t he take his pants

down? He took his pants down. This guy

uh was at 911. He was at the Boston

bombings. He called in a fake bomb at

another place

and then he did this at this thing right

after. So, somehow or another, this guy

has the state of mind that the moment

someone gets shot, he yells out and

says, “I did it. I did it.” And takes

his pants down or something like that.

And I don’t know exactly what he did.

Then ready for this? He gets arrested

for child porn right away.

Right after this happened.

Oh, right away. He’s in jail for child

porn. Why is that? Well, now you can’t

interview him.

The recent shooting of Charlie Kirk has

sparked widespread debate with shocking

details continuing to emerge in the

aftermath. Kirk was shot on September

10th, 2025 during a student Q&A at Utah

Valley University in Oram, Utah, and

tragically passed away shortly after

from his wounds. Following a 33-hour

manhunt, police arrested Tyler Robinson,

22, who now faces multiple charges,

including aggravated murder and

discharging a firearm causing serious

injury. While the case seemed

straightforward at first, public

discourse shifted when Joe Rogan weighed

in on his podcast. Rogan suggested that

the official story may not fully align

with the facts, hinting at

inconsistencies in the investigation. I

don’t necessarily think they know what’s

going on yet. There’s a lot of weird ST

going on, Rogan said, immediately

igniting a wave of speculation online.

One of the odd details Rogan highlighted

was the mention of a decoy suspect

allegedly tied to other criminal cases.

According to him, this raised red flags

about the credibility of the

investigation. Rogan also expressed

skepticism over the weapon involved. You

see, reports claim Robinson used a

restored World War I era rifle, a detail

Rogan found implausible, he questioned

how such an outdated, dismantled, and

reconstructed firearm could have been

the weapon in such a precise and deadly

attack. Frustrated by the

inconsistencies, Rogan even joked that

he wished he could investigate the case

himself, further hinting that there

might be a cover up involved.

The narrative is that this is his

grandfather’s rifle from World War I and

doesn’t have a serial code.

H

okay.

Interesting.

Okay. Why? Wait, wait, wait, wait.

Why are you using such an old gun?

There’s the other thing. They said that

he took it apart and then put it back

together again.

Shut the [ __ ] up. Do you know how much

time it would take to do that if you

were highly skilled?

Now, Joe Rogan isn’t the only

high-profile figure questioning the

official narrative surrounding the

assassination of conservative activist

Charlie Kirk. Candace Owens has now

stepped forward with her own bombshell

claims, alleging that the public has

been misled from the start. Owens, who

had teased over the weekend that she had

received new information on the case,

said she now believes Tyler Robinson was

framed. According to Candace, everything

the agencies have told us about the

Charlie Kirk assassination was a lie,

she declared. Further inflaming

speculation online. According to Owens

as she dug deeper into the case, the

name of a politician surfaced, implying

the shooting could have been tied to

something much bigger. She also disputed

law enforcement’s narrative that

Robinson was, calling it another

falsehood meant to manipulate the

public. Owens pointed to several details

she claims don’t add up. She questioned

how Robinson was willing to turn himself

in but never confessed to the shooting.

Bullet carvings. Robinson, she said,

appeared bewildered when told about the

alleged carvings on the bullets. Gun

ownership. While the gun reportedly

belonged to Robinson, Owens noted that

he’s not a gun enthusiast, casting doubt

on the state’s narrative. text message

oddities. Candace even went so far as to

claim that the messages attributed to

Robinson didn’t sound like him, noting

he doesn’t use words like vehicle, a

term found in the supposed texts. Owens

also shared that Tyler Robinson’s father

does not believe his son committed the

crime, contrary to the widespread claim

that he convinced Tyler to turn himself

in. Instead, Candace says a family

friend informed the Robinson family that

Tyler had been named as the shooter, a

heads up rather than a confession.

Adding fuel to the fire, Owens reminded

her audience that just a week before his

death, Charlie Kirk had reportedly

announced a massive internal audit of

Turning Point USA. This audit, she said,

targeted a shadowy dot type department

within the organization tasked with

probing where millions of dollars had

been going. Candace’s allegations

combined with Joe Rogan’s skepticism

have sparked a new wave of theories

online. On his podcast, Joe Rogan went

deeper into the strange details of

Charlie Kirk’s assassination, zeroing in

on the bizarre behavior of a man who

acted as a decoy during the chaos. Rogan

described this individual as an older

man who immediately after the shooting

began shouting, “I did it! I did it!”

while exposing himself to the crowd. The

man’s disturbing outburst was not only

strange, but also deeply suspicious.

According to reports, his criminal

history included connections to multiple

major past tragedies, including 9/11 and

the Boston Marathon bombing. While the

extent of his involvement in those

events remains unclear, the sheer

coincidence of his presence at yet

another high-profile incident has left

many deeply unsettled. Even more

alarming is the fact that shortly after

the Kirk shooting, this man was arrested

on charges of child content possession,

effectively silencing him from any

meaningful questioning. Rogan

highlighted how the timing of the arrest

conveniently prevented journalists or

investigators from fully probing his

actions during the shooting. “The whole

thing just doesn’t sit right,” Rogan

remarked. “The internet community has

since begun digging into the man’s

background, questioning how likely it is

that one individual could consistently

appear in the shadows of multiple

historic tragedies. Was he just a

disturbed bystander seeking attention?

Or could he have been part of a larger

scheme designed to mislead investigators

and distract the public? This decoy

suspect angle has become one of the most

chilling elements of the case. To some,

it underscores Rogan’s point that the

official story is full of holes. And to

others, it represents yet another

unanswered question in a growing list of

mysteries surrounding the assassination

of Charlie Kirk. As if the case weren’t

already fraught with enough mystery,

rumors have begun to circulate online

about Charlie Kirk’s wife and her

alleged role in the events leading up to

his assassination. Following Kirk’s

death, she assumed the position of CEO

of Turning Point USA, prompting even

more speculation about her ties to the

organization and the powerful political

figures connected to it. Several online

commentators have claimed that she has a

dark past with certain politicians

linked to TPUSA, raising questions about

whether her sudden rise to leadership

was purely circumstantial. As Charlie

had previously said he wanted her to

become CEO, or was this part of a larger

plan to make things even more

suspicious, reports surfaced of an

alleged memo signed by Charlie Kirk on

September 2nd, just days before his

death. In the document, Kirk announced

Justin Strief as the new COO of Turning

Point USA and tasked him with leading

the controversial DOG GE initiative, a

sweeping internal audit meant to expose

inefficiencies, reshape company culture,

and track where TPUSA’s

massive funding was being funneled.

Critics of the official narrative point

out that the timing of Kirk’s death, so

close to this memo, cannot be ignored.

If true, the Doge audit had the

potential to reveal sensitive financial

dealings inside the organization,

potentially angering highlevel donors

and political allies who had much to

lose. For conspiracy theorists, this

memo has become a smoking gun, a symbol

of Kirk’s possible attempt to wrestle

back control of his empire before his

life was cut short. Adding fuel to the

fire, Candace Owens has repeatedly

suggested that Kirk was under intense

political and financial pressure in the

weeks before his assassination. In one

of her most explosive claims, she

alleged that billionaire hedge fund

manager Bill Aman threatened Kirk over

his positions on Israel and TPUSA’s

internal direction. According to Owens,

Kirk resisted Aman’s alleged demands and

refused outside offers of money, only to

end up dead soon after. Aman, however,

has vehemently denied the accusations,

calling them absurd and defamatory. He

insisted he never blackmailed Kirk and

said his interactions with the

conservative activist were nothing but

extremely cordial. Still, Owens’s

allegations have fueled online

speculation that powerful financial

interests may have had a hand in

silencing Kirk before he could expose

something bigger. Now, these unverified

claims have fueled conspiracy theories

suggesting that she may have known more

than she led on about the internal

conflicts and alleged audits that were

taking place within the organization

before Kirk’s death. Adding to the

controversy were accusations that her

emotional display at Charlie’s funeral

was for show. Clips and photos from the

service began circulating on social

media with some users alleging that her

tears appeared staged or insincere.

While there’s no evidence to support

these claims, they’ve been enough to

ignite widespread speculation and draw

even more attention to her role in the

aftermath of Kirk’s assassination. For

many, these rumors represent the darkest

turn yet in a story already overflowing

with unanswered questions. Was Charlie’s

widow unfairly targeted by internet

sleuths desperate for a culprit? Or

could there really be more to her

involvement in this tragedy than meets

the eye? So, as Joe Rogan and Candace

Owens have pointed out, the sequence of

events surrounding Charlie Kirk’s

shooting is riddled with glaring

inconsistencies that have only deepened

public suspicion. How, for instance, did

the alleged shooter manage to gain

unnoticed access to the roof of a

heavily monitored building at Utah

Valley University? Why was there no

apparent surveillance or security

personnel watching such a vantage point

during a high-profile event? According

to the official narrative, the shooter

fired from the rooftop and then jumped

down to flee the scene. Yet, the few

video clips that have surfaced raise

more questions than answers. Some clips

appear to show an individual moving away

from the roof in a manner inconsistent

with the sudden escape, while others

lack the continuity one might expect

from such a dramatic sequence of events.

Compounding these doubts is the strange

behavior of the decoy suspect, who drew

attention to himself by shouting, “I did

it!” before later being arrested on

unrelated charges. This bizarre twist

has fueled speculation that the public

is being deliberately misdirected. As

the investigation drags on, social media

has become a battleground for shaping

public perception. Users across

platforms have begun piecing together

details from leaks, old photos, and

archived posts, forming their own

theories. The more these weird details

pile up, the decoy, the alleged

shooter’s questionable background, the

strange weapon choice, the suspicious

timing of internal memos at TPUSA, the

more people believe that the chaos

itself might be intentional. For many,

the Charlie Kirk incident no longer

reads as a simple act of violence, but

as a complex web of strange behaviors,

questionable narratives, and potential

conspiracies. Each inconsistency chips

away at public trust in official

accounts. Whether by design or by

accident, the narrative now feels

fractured, even fabricated. As more

information trickles out, one thing is

clear. This is not just a story about a

tragic shooting. It’s a story about

narrative control, influence, and public

skepticism. And until the full truth

emerges, many argue the only responsible

response is vigilance, critical

thinking, and a refusal to accept any

single version of events at face value.

So, what do you think about this drama?

Let me know your opinions in the

comments. And don’t forget to check out

our other videos to ensure you are all

up to date with all the latest drama.

Till next time, bye.