Blake Lively is requesting a stronger protective order from the courts after claiming she has received “violent” messages amid the ongoing legal battle with her “It Ends With Us” co-star Justin

YouTube Thumbnail Downloader FULL HQ IMAGE

 

In recent developments surrounding Blake Lively’s legal battles, the actress has taken significant steps to enhance her protective measures against potential threats.

 

As the ongoing lawsuit progresses, Lively’s legal team has submitted a formal request for a more robust protective order.

 

This request comes amidst her conflict with Justin Baldoni, the director and star of the film “It Ends With Us.

 

” The letter, dated February 20 and obtained by E! News, outlines specific demands aimed at safeguarding Lively and her family from further harm.

 

 

Blake Lively and Ryan Reynolds arrive at the SNL50: The Anniversary Special red carpet, Saturday Night Live

 

Among the key requests in the letter is the classification of certain discovery materials as “attorney’s eyes only.

 

” This designation would restrict access to sensitive information, limiting it to legal counsel only.

 

The legal team argues that this classification is essential to protect highly confidential, personal, and proprietary information.

 

They assert that the disclosure of such materials could lead to competitive, commercial, financial, or privacy-related injuries for the producing party involved in the litigation.

 

The letter also emphasizes the need for confidentiality concerning high-profile individuals connected to the case.

 

 

Blake Lively, Justin Baldoni

 

The situation escalates further with the inclusion of alarming details in Lively’s amended complaint.

 

The document reveals that Lively, her family, and other cast members have been subjected to a barrage of violent, profane, and threatening communications.

 

Such harassment not only targets Lively but also extends to various fact witnesses who have publicly supported her.

 

The legal team highlights a particularly disturbing incident where a witness received a written threat, indicating that their family would face sexual assault and death unless they complied with demands regarding their testimony.

 

This level of intimidation underscores the serious implications of the ongoing litigation.

 

 

Blake Lively, Justin Baldoni

 

Additionally, the request for a stronger protective order references the intense online backlash directed at Lively.

 

The actress has faced a wave of vicious comments and threats on social media platforms, prompting Meta, the parent company of Facebook and Instagram, to publicly condemn such harassment.

 

The legal team argues that this online vitriol creates a hostile environment that could further jeopardize Lively’s safety and well-being.

 

The attorney’s assertion that the release of certain information could lead to real harm emphasizes the urgent need for legal protections in this case.

 

 

Justin Baldoni, Blake Lively

 

The implications of the protective order extend beyond Lively and her immediate circle.

 

The legal arguments presented by her attorneys highlight the potential for witness intimidation, which could compromise the integrity of the judicial process.

 

By ensuring that sensitive information remains confidential, Lively’s legal team aims to create a safer environment for all involved parties.

 

The fear of retaliation or harm could deter witnesses from coming forward or providing truthful testimony, which is a significant concern in any legal battle.

 

 

Justin Baldoni

 

As the case unfolds, the focus remains on the balance between transparency in the legal process and the need for protection against threats and harassment.

 

Lively’s pursuit of a stronger protective order reflects not only her personal stakes in the litigation but also broader issues of safety and privacy in high-profile legal disputes.

 

The outcome of this request may set a precedent for how similar cases are handled in the future, particularly in an era where online harassment and intimidation are increasingly prevalent.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

Blake Lively Requests STRONGER Protective Order Amid Justin Baldoni Lawsuit | E! News – YouTube
(00:00) Blake Lively is seeking additional legal protection amid that it ends with us actress’s ongoing Court battle with the film’s director and star Justin baldoni Blake’s legal team has submitted a letter on her and husband Ryan Reynolds behalf requesting a more comprehensive protective order amid the litigation per the February 20th letter obtained by E news among the requests is allowing certain Discovery material to be categorized as attorney’s Eyes Only limiting who is able to view such information the letter says the category
(00:38) will only be applied to material quote of such a highly confidential impersonal sensitive or proprietary nature that the revelation of such is likely to cause a competitive business Commercial Financial or privacy injury to the producing party with the document specifically naming high-profile individuals to whom a duty of confidentiality is owed as part of the justification for such a category an additional letter filed by the Gossip Girl alums team cites the 37-year-old’s newly filed amended complaint stating as
(01:14) detailed in M Lively’s amended complaint Miss Lively her family other members of the cast various fact Witnesses and individuals that have spoken out publicly in support of Miss Lively have received violent profane sexist and threatening commun Communications the letter goes on to claim that one of the fact Witnesses referenced in wayfair’s complaint quote received a written threat indicating that the witness’s family would be sexually assaulted and killed unless the witness agreed to make a statement and give the truth the request also
(01:48) references online backlash against Blake that was quote so vicious that meta publicly stated that that kind of online harassment is wrong and we condemn it Blake and Ryan’s attorney attes argue it is entirely foreseeable probable and inevitable that the release of certain information could cause injury by violating their privacy exposing them to threats and creating a climate of possible witness intimidation [Music]