Fox News host Pete Hegseth erupted in outrage over the NFL’s decision to feature Bad Bunny at the 2026 Super Bowl halftime show, claiming the league politicized America’s biggest sporting event, sparking nationwide debate, fan outrage, and heated cultural conflict.

The NFL’s decision to feature global reggaeton superstar Bad Bunny as the headliner for the 2026 Super Bowl halftime show has ignited an unprecedented wave of controversy, drawing sharp criticism from conservative commentators and divided reactions from fans across the nation.

Fox News host Pete Hegseth, known for his outspoken conservative viewpoints, launched a scathing attack on the league during his morning broadcast of Fox & Friends on October 8, 2025, calling the Puerto Rican singer a “Spanish-singing puppet of the Left” and accusing the NFL of turning America’s most-watched sporting event into a platform for political activism.

The performance is scheduled for February 2, 2026, at Allegiant Stadium in Las Vegas, Nevada, a city known for its dazzling entertainment but now, according to critics, a stage for cultural conflict.

“This isn’t about football anymore,” Hegseth declared, his voice rising with palpable anger.

“The NFL has chosen a performer who embodies everything that’s tearing our country apart.

Bad Bunny is not just a musician; he’s a political symbol who uses his music and public platform to push a divisive agenda.

The Super Bowl, once a unifying celebration of sport, has now been hijacked for political messaging.

They’ve declared war on America’s values, and fans deserve to know it.”

Hegseth’s comments tapped into a growing debate among conservatives who argue that the NFL has increasingly allowed political considerations to overshadow the sport itself.

While the Super Bowl halftime show has historically featured global superstars such as Beyoncé, Prince, Madonna, and The Weeknd, those performances were largely seen as entertainment spectacles, without overt political messaging.

Bad Bunny, whose real name is Benito Antonio Martínez Ocasio, has gained international fame not only for his genre-defying music—which fuses reggaeton, Latin trap, and pop—but also for his outspoken activism.

Over the past decade, he has publicly supported LGBTQ+ rights, advocated for Puerto Rican independence, and addressed broader social justice issues, making him both a beloved figure to many and a controversial one to others.

Social media erupted almost immediately following Hegseth’s statements, with hashtags like #BoycottSuperBowl and #BadBunnySuperBowl trending on Twitter, Instagram, and TikTok.

Fans are sharply divided.

Some expressed excitement over Bad Bunny’s inclusion, praising the NFL for embracing diversity and appealing to a younger, international audience.

Others echoed Hegseth’s criticism, arguing that football fans tune in to watch the game, not political statements.

One Twitter user wrote, “I love Bad Bunny’s music, but I don’t want politics shoved into my Super Bowl experience.

This is not what the game is about.

” Another added, “The NFL has crossed a line—football should unite, not divide.”

Despite the backlash, cultural commentators and music industry experts defended Bad Bunny’s inclusion, emphasizing the halftime show’s role as a reflection of evolving entertainment trends.

Maria González, a prominent music journalist, explained, “Bad Bunny is a cultural icon whose influence extends far beyond music.

The NFL is acknowledging the growing impact of Latin music globally, and this is a celebration of diversity and artistry, not a political statement.

The halftime show has always evolved with popular culture, and this is simply the next step.”

The league itself issued a brief statement in support of the selection, noting that the halftime show aims to showcase talent that resonates with a wide, global audience.

“We are proud to feature artists who represent the diversity and creativity of today’s music landscape,” the statement read.

“Bad Bunny’s artistry and worldwide influence make him a perfect fit for this year’s halftime show.”

While the NFL’s defense may reassure some, the controversy is unlikely to subside before the game.

With the Super Bowl in Las Vegas, a city synonymous with entertainment and spectacle, the stakes are higher than ever.

The performance promises not only to entertain millions of viewers worldwide but also to serve as a cultural flashpoint, highlighting the ongoing tension between politics, entertainment, and sports in modern America.

Adding to the complexity, Bad Bunny himself has remained largely silent regarding the controversy, focusing on his music releases and ongoing international tour.

His representatives have emphasized that the artist views the Super Bowl as an opportunity to share his unique sound and energy with a massive audience, rather than as a platform for political debate.

Nevertheless, Hegseth’s fiery denunciations and the ensuing social media storm have ensured that the 2026 Super Bowl halftime show will be remembered as one of the most contentious in history.

As fans prepare for what promises to be a record-breaking television event, one thing is clear: this halftime show is about more than just music.

It has become a battleground for cultural identity, political discourse, and generational divides.

Pete Hegseth’s condemnation, combined with the fervent online debate, underscores how the Super Bowl has evolved from a purely sporting spectacle into a symbol of broader societal conflicts, ensuring that when Bad Bunny takes the stage in February, the world will be watching—and debating—every note.