Nicole Kidman’s $325M Divorce: The Shocking ‘Cocaine Clause’ That Changed Everything

When Nicole Kidman and Keith Urban tied the knot in 2006, it seemed like the perfect Hollywood love story.

A glamorous Oscar-winning actress and a charming country music superstar, they appeared to have it all.

Yet, after 18 years of marriage, their fairy tale has come to an end in what is shaping up to be one of the most expensive and dramatic divorces Hollywood has ever seen.

With a combined fortune of $325 million, 11 luxury properties, and two daughters, this split is anything but ordinary.

And at the center of it all is a shocking prenuptial agreement clause that has left fans and legal experts stunned: the “Cocaine Clause.”

The story of Nicole and Keith’s relationship began in 2005 when they met at a Los Angeles gala.

By 2006, they were married in a lavish ceremony in Sydney, Australia, complete with paparazzi, adoring fans, and global headlines.

For Nicole, fresh off her high-profile divorce from Tom Cruise, Keith seemed like a stabilizing force.

But their marriage wasn’t without its challenges.

Early on, Keith entered rehab for cocaine and alcohol addiction, a move that Nicole publicly supported as a “test of love and loyalty.”

However, that chapter of their marriage would later resurface in the most unexpected way.

In September 2025, news broke that Nicole had filed for divorce, citing “irreconcilable differences.”

While rumors swirled about a potential new woman in Keith’s life, the real drama unfolded behind the scenes.

The couple’s $325 million fortune, which includes 11 luxury properties spread across three continents, became a contentious point of division.

From a $9 million Nashville mansion to a $6.5 million New York apartment and a $4 million Beverly Hills estate, their real estate portfolio is as impressive as it is valuable.

Each property holds sentimental value, but in the world of high-stakes divorces, emotions often take a backseat to financial strategy.

Nicole reportedly wants to retain her Sydney estate and New York apartment, while Keith has his sights set on the Nashville mansion.

But dividing these assets isn’t as simple as drawing a line down the middle.

Many of their properties have appreciated significantly over the years, outperforming even the stock market.

For Nicole and Keith, the division of these homes is about more than just money—it’s about long-term investment potential.

And then there’s the prenuptial agreement, which has become the most talked-about aspect of their divorce.

Dubbed the “Cocaine Clause,” this provision in their prenup was reportedly Nicole’s idea, introduced after Keith’s rehab stint in 2006.

The clause states that if Keith were to relapse into drug use, Nicole could walk away with everything.

Under normal circumstances, however, Keith is entitled to an $11.4 million payout—a significant sum by most standards but a mere fraction of Nicole’s $250 million personal fortune.

Fans and critics alike have called it one of the most one-sided prenups in Hollywood history.

While the “Cocaine Clause” may seem harsh, it was designed as both a protective measure for Nicole and a motivator for Keith to stay clean.

It’s not the first time a celebrity prenup has made headlines.

Britney Spears famously had a prenup that safeguarded her fortune from Kevin Federline, while Jessica Simpson’s included a clause about weight gain.

In comparison, Nicole’s clause is being hailed as both shrewd and shocking, a testament to the high-stakes nature of Hollywood relationships.

But this divorce isn’t just about money and property.

It’s also about family.

Nicole and Keith share two daughters, Sunday Rose and Faith Margaret, and custody of the children is poised to become a central issue.

Nicole has been vocal about her desire for primary custody, a stance likely influenced by her painful experience losing daily custody of her adopted children, Isabella and Connor, after her divorce from Tom Cruise.

For Nicole, this battle is as much about protecting her relationship with her daughters as it is about financial leverage.

In high-profile divorces, custody arrangements can significantly impact child support calculations and property settlements, making this a critical aspect of their split.

Future earnings also play a significant role in the financial negotiations.

Nicole, who continues to command millions for her acting roles and production deals, has her income protected under the terms of the prenup.

Keith’s music earnings, however, are not as secure.

His lucrative tours, which generate tens of millions annually, could be factored into child or spousal support calculations, potentially increasing the final divorce settlement.

As the details of their split continue to unfold, one question lingers: who will come out on top?

On paper, Nicole appears to have the upper hand.

Her fortune remains largely intact, and she stands to retain most of their properties and secure primary custody of their daughters.

Keith, meanwhile, walks away with his $11.4 million payout, which, while life-changing for most, feels small in the context of their combined wealth.

However, if Keith leverages custody or future earnings in the negotiations, the scales could tip in his favor.

Ultimately, this divorce is more than just a Hollywood breakup—it’s a case study in the complexities of love, money, and power.

With a $325 million fortune, a prenuptial agreement that reads like a movie script, and custody battles that echo Nicole’s past heartbreak, this split is a stark reminder of the high stakes that come with fame and fortune.

As the world watches this drama unfold, one question remains: in the glittering world of Hollywood, can love ever truly be unconditional, or is every relationship just a carefully negotiated business arrangement?