NFL in Uproar: Colin Cowherd DEMANDS Shedeur Sanders Start After Dylan Gabriel’s Rocky Debut — ‘Guess Cleveland Loves Drama More Than Wins!’

The Cleveland Browns’ quarterback competition has exploded into a national talking point, and Colin Cowherd’s recent comments have only added fuel to the fire.

After watching Dylan Gabriel’s debut, Cowherd didn’t hold back, calling it a troubling sign for the Browns’ offense and making a strong case for Shedeur Sanders to take over the starting role immediately.

Cowherd’s critique was blunt: Gabriel’s size is a serious concern, making him a difficult player to build around long-term.

In contrast, Sanders, who was underdrafted in the fifth round, offers not only better physical attributes but also superior mobility and playmaking ability.

Cowherd emphasized that Sanders outperformed Gabriel in both practice and preseason appearances, making the Browns’ hesitation to start him all the more baffling.

The debate over the Browns’ quarterback future has been intense, but Cowherd’s endorsement of Sanders shifted the narrative.

He suggested that Gabriel’s quieter, less flashy style might appeal to the Browns’ leadership seeking stability over star power.

Cowherd noted that general managers often prefer “boring” quarterbacks—those who won’t attract distracting media attention or create off-field drama.

This notion of “boring” versus “exciting” quarterbacks cuts to the heart of the Browns’ dilemma.

Sanders brings undeniable flair and a magnetic presence that excites fans and raises expectations.

Gabriel, while less dynamic, fits the mold of a steady, low-profile player.

Cowherd’s analysis suggests the Browns chose Gabriel for the perceived safety of stability, even if it means sacrificing upside.

Yet, the tide seems to be turning.

Browns General Manager Andrew Berry publicly praised Sanders after a standout performance, calling him a player to be proud of and highlighting his poise on the field.

Berry’s fatherly endorsement signals a growing recognition within the organization of Sanders’ potential.

Adding to the chorus of support, sports icon Stephen A. Smith weighed in with his own strong opinion.

Smith declared Sanders the better quarterback, especially under pressure, and criticized Gabriel for making ill-advised remarks about Sanders that only added unnecessary drama to the competition.

Smith underscored Sanders’ ability to handle intense scrutiny and media pressure with grace—a crucial trait for any franchise quarterback.

He argued that while Gabriel showed flashes of brilliance, his off-field comments overshadowed his on-field efforts, potentially undermining team cohesion.

The Browns’ quarterback saga is now as much about personality and media management as it is about talent.

Smith’s criticism of Gabriel’s comments highlights how internal conflicts can ripple outward, affecting public perception and possibly team morale.

Despite Gabriel’s moments of composure and accuracy, his controversial remarks have complicated his standing.

Meanwhile, Sanders continues to impress quietly, managing expectations and external pressures with professionalism and maturity.

The NFL community remains divided.

Cowherd champions Sanders as the dynamic choice who can elevate the Browns, while acknowledging the organization’s preference for Gabriel’s steadiness.

Smith, however, is unequivocal: Sanders is the superior player who thrives when the spotlight is brightest.

This quarterback duel isn’t just about who starts week one—it symbolizes a deeper organizational crossroads for Cleveland.

Do they embrace the risk and excitement Sanders offers, or settle for the perceived safety of Gabriel’s steadiness?

Fans and analysts alike are watching closely, aware that the Browns’ decision will shape the franchise’s trajectory for years.

The stakes are high, and the pressure on Stefanski and the front office to make the right call intensifies with every snap.

As the preseason progresses, the question lingers: will the Browns finally give Sanders the chance to lead, or will they continue to hedge their bets on Gabriel?

The answers remain elusive, but the debate promises to dominate headlines.

Ultimately, this isn’t just a quarterback battle; it’s a test of Cleveland’s willingness to embrace change and pursue greatness.

Sanders’ talent and composure suggest he’s ready for the challenge.

Whether the Browns are ready to follow suit is another matter entirely.

The drama surrounding the Browns’ quarterbacks is far from over, but one thing is clear—Shedeur Sanders has made his case.

Now, it’s up to Cleveland to decide if they want to play it safe or dare to dream big.

So, who do you think should start for the Browns?

The steady hand of Dylan Gabriel or the electrifying promise of Shedeur Sanders?

The NFL waits with bated breath.