Oscars Prediction: After SAG Awards, Timothée Chalamet May Lose But Demi Moore Has to Win Her 1st Oscar

The road to the Academy Awards has always been filled with surprises, and this year is no exception.

After the results of the Screen Actors Guild (SAG) Awards, the Oscar race has become even more unpredictable.

While Timothée Chalamet was once considered a frontrunner for Best Actor, the momentum seems to be shifting away from him.

→ Swipe to see more articles

Related Posts

The Rock teams up with legends Martin Scorsese and Leonardo DiCaprio

Who’s DEFENDING Diddy?! The Celebs, Family & Paid Supporters Flooding Court Amid Explosive Sex Trafficking Trial!

Naruto’s Darkest Form Yet? Live Action Concept Trailer Shows a Pain-Fueled Hero Fans Have Never Seen Before!

Unveiling the Performer: An Inside Look at Michael Learns To Rock’s Latest Musical Journey

Faith Evans Finally Breaks Her Silence on THAT Night with Tupac — The Truth That Rocked Biggie to the Core

Mariah Carey EXPOSES Eminem’s Dark Secrets After 20 Years – “I Protected Him, But That Ends NOW”

On the other hand, Demi Moore, a Hollywood icon who has never won an Oscar, now stands as a strong contender for her first golden statuette.

Timothée Chalamet’s Declining Odds

Timothée Chalamet has delivered a widely praised performance in Wonka, showcasing his versatility and charisma.

However, despite his strong presence during the awards season, his chances of winning Best Actor at the Oscars may have diminished after the SAG Awards.

Historically, the SAG Awards serve as a strong predictor for the Oscars, and Chalamet’s loss to a fellow nominee signals a shift in voting trends.

With Cillian Murphy (Oppenheimer) or Paul Giamatti (The Holdovers) gaining significant traction, Chalamet might find himself edged out of the winner’s circle.

Another factor working against Chalamet is the Academy’s preference for dramatic and transformative performances.

While Wonka was a delightful showcase of his talent, it may not fit the mold of past Oscar-winning roles in the Best Actor category.

This could push Academy voters to favor performances with heavier dramatic weight, making it harder for Chalamet to clinch the award.

Demi Moore’s Long-Overdue Recognition

While Chalamet’s Oscar chances are uncertain, Demi Moore is experiencing a career-defining moment.

The veteran actress, who has delivered memorable performances throughout her career, has never won an Academy Award despite her undeniable talent.

With her latest role receiving widespread acclaim, many believe this could finally be her year.

Moore’s performance in The Substance has been described as one of the most powerful of her career, earning her critical praise and a standing ovation at multiple festivals.

The SAG Award win has only solidified her position as a frontrunner in the Best Actress category.

If history is any indication, a SAG win often correlates with an Oscar victory, making Moore’s chances look incredibly strong.

Beyond her performance, Moore’s potential win would be a historic moment in Hollywood.

Having been an industry icon since the 1980s, she has overcome challenges and reinvented herself multiple times.

Winning an Oscar would not only honor her latest role but also serve as long-overdue recognition for her contributions to cinema.

What This Means for the Oscars

With the Academy Awards just around the corner, the race remains tight.

If the SAG Awards are a reliable indicator, Chalamet may struggle to secure a win, while Moore seems poised for a long-awaited victory.

Of course, surprises are always possible on Oscar night, but the current momentum suggests that while Chalamet’s fans may have to wait for another year, Moore could finally have her Oscar moment.

As Hollywood prepares for its biggest night, all eyes will be on these two actors.

Will the Academy follow the SAG Awards’ lead, or will they surprise everyone with a different outcome? Only time will tell, but one thing is certain—this year’s Oscars will be one for the history books.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.