🔥Jane Fonda UNHINGED?! Her ‘Woke’ Awards Speech Just Sparked a Firestorm—Here’s What She Said!🤯🎭

It wasn’t just another night of glitz, gowns, and overlong thank-you speeches at the Screen Actors Guild Awards.

Jane Fonda, who received a lifetime achievement award, used the stage not to look back on a legacy spanning decades, but to hammer home a message that many viewers found divisive, confusing, and frankly, a

little unhinged.

“Empathy is not weak or woke,” Fonda declared, before launching into a high-pitched rally cry about resisting what’s “coming our way”—a not-so-subtle jab at former President Donald Trump and anyone daring

to challenge progressive orthodoxy.

And in true Fonda fashion, it didn’t stop at politics.

The Oscar winner called on Hollywood to open its metaphorical “big tent,” welcoming people of all political stripes—just before delivering a scorching sermon that alienated anyone not fully on board with the left’s

agenda.

Irony, apparently, is dead in Hollywood.

Even more ironic: she delivered her plea for unity in a city ravaged by policies she seems to support—rampant homelessness, unchecked crime, and urban decay fueled by progressive governance.

Greg Gutfeld wasted no time in torching Fonda’s remarks.

“There’s your empathy, lady,” he snapped, noting the tent shortages in L.A.

due to the exploding homeless population.

Gutfeld has long criticized the “toxic empathy” permeating leftist politics—compassion that enables destruction rather than halts it.

He pointed out that the feel-good policies hailed as humane have devastated communities, all while elites like Fonda celebrate them from their gated mansions.

But Fonda wasn’t the only one making headlines.

The president of the Screen Actors Guild, seemingly auditioning for a disaster movie, ranted about climate change in a bizarre stream-of-consciousness monologue.

She recounted a fantastical January 2025 natural disaster—fires, floods, mudslides, and earthquakes—and linked it all, somehow, to “maniacal, ego-driven thought.

” Translation? She blamed Trump.

Again.

As if he single-handedly summoned the wrath of nature with a press conference.

Dr.

Drew Pinsky chimed in with a scorching critique, introducing the term “toxic empathy”—a phenomenon where sympathy crosses the line into dysfunction.

He likened Fonda’s worldview to enabling addiction.

“Giving them the rigs, the tents, the heroin? That’s a death sentence,” he warned, referring to current liberal harm-reduction approaches to homelessness and drug use.

His point was clear: empathy isn’t about letting people rot with a smile.

Real help is tough love.

Fonda’s brand, he argued, was the opposite.

Comedian Tom Shillue piled on, mocking the faux wisdom that sometimes comes with age.

“She’s five years older than Biden, looks good, sounds strong—but she’s dead wrong,” he quipped.

And while Fonda once turned heads as the controversial ‘Hanoi Jane,’ at least she had clarity in her views.

Now? “She’s gotten dumber,” Tom said bluntly.

Ouch.

Then came the takedown of her relevance.

“I remember when people looked to Jane Fonda for workout advice,” co-host Kat Timpf joked.

“Now the only ones asking her for anything are probably not interested in her politics either.

” Kat went further, slamming the Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) movement Fonda champions, calling it a “code word for lowered standards.

” According to Kat, real empathy means expecting excellence—not pandering to victimhood.

And as if things couldn’t get more absurd, panelist Michele Tafoya drew a hilarious comparison between SAG President Fran Drescher’s climate rant and Vice President Kamala Harris’s notoriously incoherent

speeches.

“It sounded like Kamala’s word salad—wind, greed, earthquakes, rain, put your feet on the sand.

What was that?” she laughed.

Michele also pointed out the glaring scientific inaccuracy in the speech: “Earthquakes aren’t caused by climate change.

That’s just not how geology works.

” A Hollywood starlet confusing sci-fi with science? Shocking.

It’s all part of a larger trend where elite celebrities, armed with emotional buzzwords and zero policy understanding, lecture the rest of America from their moral high horses.

Jane Fonda is just the latest—and loudest—example.

What makes it particularly galling is that these speeches are cloaked in language about compassion and unity, but their tone is anything but inclusive.

They’re divisive, sanctimonious, and totally disconnected from the daily struggles of ordinary Americans.

If Fonda truly cared about helping people, critics argue, she might use her immense wealth and influence to build housing, fund rehabilitation centers, or push for safer streets.

Instead, she gives us melodrama in a designer dress—doom-laden diatribes about impending authoritarianism, environmental collapse, and how woke means giving a “f***” about others.

Well, tell that to the people suffering under the weight of the policies she’s endorsing.

As Gutfeld wrapped up the segment, the takeaway was clear: empathy without accountability is a dead-end road.

And Jane Fonda, for all her star power, seems more interested in virtue-signaling than real solutions.

Hollywood may still treat her like royalty, but for millions of Americans watching from outside the bubble, her latest performance felt less like an award-worthy moment—and more like a cautionary tale of what

happens when activism replaces wisdom.

One thing’s for sure—Fonda’s fire hasn’t dimmed.

But if she keeps turning the volume up on the woke gospel while ignoring its consequences, she risks becoming less a voice of reason and more a symbol of elite delusion.

In a city drowning in crisis, maybe it’s time for less “wokeness” and a little more wisdom.