In the ever-evolving landscape of American politics, few figures have faced as much scrutiny as Vice President Kamala Harris.

Recently, Alyssa Farah Griffin, a co-host of “The View” and former supporter of Harris, voiced her concerns regarding the Vice President’s recent appearance on Stephen Colbert’s late-night show.

Griffin characterized this decision as a significant misstep, emblematic of the Democratic Party’s ongoing struggle to adapt following its disappointing performance in the 2024 elections.

Griffin’s critique came during a segment on CNN, where she expressed her dismay over Harris’s choice to promote her new book, “107 Days,” on a platform that has been criticized for its political bias.

She likened the situation to “announcing your exploratory committee on the sinking deck of the Titanic,” highlighting the disconnect between the Democratic Party’s actions and the sentiments of the electorate.

This metaphor not only underscores Griffin’s frustration but also reflects a broader concern about the party’s failure to learn from its past mistakes.

The backdrop of this discussion is Harris’s low profile since her electoral defeat in 2024, which many viewed as a crushing blow to her political aspirations.

The Vice President’s reemergence in the public eye, particularly through an interview with Colbert—whose show has been canceled—has raised eyebrows rather than applause.

Critics argue that such appearances do little to rebuild her image or address the pressing issues facing the Democratic Party.

Griffin, a former official in the Trump administration who crossed party lines to support Harris in the last election, did not hold back in her assessment.

She described the interview as a political misfire and a reflection of the party’s ongoing collapse.

According to Griffin, the Democratic Party’s messaging surrounding democracy is tone-deaf, failing to resonate with the voters they have lost.

This sentiment echoes a broader narrative that suggests the party is out of touch with the American public.

As Harris promoted her book, which details what she calls “the shortest presidential campaign in modern history,” the choice to appear on CBS—especially after the cancellation of Colbert’s show—seemed ill-timed.

CBS announced in July that it would be ending “The Late Show” in May, citing financial losses.

Critics have suggested that Colbert’s firing was politically motivated, occurring shortly after he criticized CBS’s parent company for its legal dealings with Donald Trump.

However, Griffin dismissed this narrative, emphasizing that the economics of network television are shifting and that Harris’s decision to engage with a struggling network reflects a lack of strategic foresight.

Harris’s comments during the interview, where she suggested she has no current plans to run for governor of California, further fueled skepticism about her political future.

She stated, “Recently, I made the decision that I just—for now, I don’t want to go back in the system.

I think it’s broken.

” This admission, paired with her previous electoral defeat, raises questions about her viability as a candidate moving forward.

CNN data analyst Harry Enten echoed Griffin’s skepticism, suggesting that Harris’s assertion about not wanting to return to the political arena is disingenuous.

He pointed out that with her approval ratings at historic lows, the reality of her situation is stark.

“She would be the weakest front-runner since 1992,” Enten remarked, highlighting the uphill battle Harris faces if she intends to remain in the political spotlight.

Griffin’s critique extended beyond Harris to encompass the Democratic Party as a whole.

She argued that the party has failed to adapt to the new political climate, particularly in understanding why Donald Trump’s message continues to resonate with millions of Americans.

Trump has been open about his policy intentions, including controversial proposals like abolishing the Department of Education.

Griffin contended that Democrats have not adequately listened to the electorate, failing to recognize the aspects of Trump’s message that appeal to voters.

“The fact that Democrats couldn’t listen to the American public and think, ‘Okay, something he’s saying is resonating.

What can we do to beat him?’—that’s where I kind of, they lose it for me,” Griffin stated.

This perspective underscores a critical challenge for the Democratic Party: the need to engage with voters on their terms rather than relying on traditional party rhetoric that may no longer be effective.

As Harris prepares to release her new book, “107 Days,” set for publication in September, the stakes are high.

The memoir is expected to provide a behind-the-scenes look at her short-lived presidential campaign and offer lessons learned.

Harris herself has framed the book as a path forward, stating, “I believe there’s value in sharing what I saw, what I learned, and what I know it will take to move forward.

” However, with the Democratic Party still reeling from its 2024 defeat and Harris’s approval ratings in decline, many critics argue that she may not be the right messenger at this pivotal moment.

The challenges facing Harris and the Democratic Party are not merely political; they reflect deeper societal shifts.

Voter sentiment is increasingly shaped by issues such as economic inequality, social justice, and the perception of government effectiveness.

As the party navigates this complex landscape, it must confront the reality that traditional strategies may no longer suffice.

In conclusion, Kamala Harris’s recent media appearances and the subsequent critique from figures like Alyssa Farah Griffin highlight the significant challenges facing the Vice President and the Democratic Party as a whole.

The disconnect between the party’s messaging and the electorate’s concerns raises critical questions about its future direction.

As Harris prepares to share her experiences in her upcoming book, the political landscape remains fraught with uncertainty.

The ability of Harris and the Democratic Party to adapt to the evolving political climate will be crucial in determining their success in the coming years.

With the 2024 elections behind them, the Democratic Party must not only reassess its strategies but also reconnect with the voters it has lost.

The path forward requires a willingness to listen, adapt, and engage meaningfully with the American public.

Only then can the party hope to regain its footing and restore confidence among its constituents.