Jermaine Jackson is once again at the center of a prolonged legal dispute as his estranged wife, Halima Rashid, has returned to court with new filings that reignite their long-running battle over spousal support.

Years after their separation, the case remains unresolved, revealing deep financial tensions, conflicting claims, and a marriage that ended far more bitterly than it began.

Rashid is now asking the court to intervene, arguing that Jackson has failed to comply with previous orders and that she has been left struggling financially while he continues to benefit from substantial income streams.

The latest court documents filed by Rashid accuse Jackson of ignoring a spousal support order that dates back to May 2018.

According to her filings, a judge ordered Jackson to pay her 2,500 dollars per month in spousal support, yet she claims she has not received a single payment since the order was issued.

Nearly seven years later, Rashid asserts that the unpaid support has accumulated into a significant debt, one that she believes Jackson has deliberately avoided paying despite having the means to do so.

Rashid and Jackson were married in 2004, entering into a union that initially appeared stable and private compared to the highly publicized lives of other members of the Jackson family.

Over time, however, the marriage deteriorated.

In June 2016, Rashid officially filed for divorce after 11 years of marriage, citing irreconcilable differences and what she described as ongoing financial irresponsibility on Jackson’s part.

From the beginning, the divorce proceedings were contentious, with both sides presenting sharply different narratives about money, responsibility, and trust.

In her most recent filings, Rashid paints a picture of financial hardship.

She claims that while Jackson continues to have access to substantial income and assets, she has been left to struggle, particularly as she takes care of her elderly parents.

Rashid argues that Jackson has been sitting on significant financial resources while she has been forced to live with limited income and mounting expenses.

She maintains that during their marriage, Jackson earned anywhere between 50,000 and 500,000 dollars per month, largely from music royalties, performances, and other entertainment-related ventures.

Based on that earning capacity, she believes the spousal support order was reasonable and necessary.

At the time she filed for divorce, Rashid requested a division of marital assets that included vehicles, electronics, and a collection of portraits depicting Michael Jackson.

She also sought 35,000 dollars per month in spousal support, arguing that she had become financially dependent on Jackson during their marriage and lacked the resources to maintain a reasonable standard of living on her own.

According to Rashid, her personal income at the time of the divorce was approximately 600 dollars per month, a figure she says made her entirely reliant on court-ordered support.

Jackson, however, has consistently disputed Rashid’s claims.

In his own court filings, the singer has alleged that Rashid engaged in financial misconduct during their marriage and after their separation.

He claims that she diverted money from his music royalties without his knowledge or consent, directing payments away from his designated accounts.

According to Jackson, Rashid received a total of 93,900 dollars from his royalties beginning in December 2017, funds he claims were improperly accessed.

In addition to the alleged royalty diversion, Jackson has accused Rashid of transferring 250,000 dollars from what he describes as community assets into a company without his permission.

He argues that this transfer was unauthorized and further evidence that Rashid cannot be trusted with financial matters.

These accusations have added another layer of complexity to the case, transforming what might have been a straightforward spousal support dispute into a broader conflict over financial transparency and control.

Jackson has also presented his own version of his financial situation, one that sharply contrasts with Rashid’s portrayal of him as wealthy and financially secure.

According to documents he submitted to the court, Jackson reported a monthly income of just over 1,300 dollars.

At the same time, he listed monthly expenses totaling more than 10,900 dollars.

These expenses reportedly include an 8,000-dollar mortgage payment, 1,000 dollars spent on clothing, and 1,500 dollars in child support payments to another woman.

Jackson further disclosed that he is behind on child support payments in a separate case, owing approximately 29,000 dollars.

This admission has raised questions about his overall financial management and whether his reported income accurately reflects his true earning capacity.

Rashid’s legal team has suggested that Jackson may be underreporting his income, particularly given his long career in the music industry and ongoing royalty streams associated with the Jackson family legacy.

The court is now faced with the difficult task of determining which version of events is closer to the truth.

On one hand, Rashid claims she has received no spousal support despite a clear court order and believes Jackson is deliberately withholding payments.

On the other hand, Jackson argues that he is financially strained, burdened by expenses, and the victim of financial misconduct by his estranged wife.

The conflicting narratives highlight the challenges courts often face when dealing with high-profile divorces involving complex income sources such as royalties and intellectual property.

Beyond the legal arguments, the case also sheds light on the emotional toll of prolonged divorce proceedings.

Nearly a decade after their separation, both parties remain locked in a dispute that has consumed time, resources, and personal energy.

For Rashid, the unresolved spousal support issue represents more than just money; it is a matter of fairness and accountability.

She argues that the court’s order was clear and that failure to enforce it undermines the legal process itself.

For Jackson, the case appears to be part of a broader pattern of financial and legal difficulties that have followed him in recent years.

As a member of one of the most famous families in music history, he has long lived under the assumption that fame equates to wealth.

However, the reality of managing royalties, expenses, and legal obligations has proven far more complicated.

His filings suggest a man struggling to balance his obligations while defending himself against accusations he believes are exaggerated or false.

The judge overseeing the case will now have to decide whether to enforce the existing spousal support order, potentially compelling Jackson to pay the accumulated arrears, or to revisit the terms based on the financial disclosures provided by both sides.

The outcome could have significant implications not only for Rashid’s financial stability but also for Jackson’s future obligations.

As the legal battle continues, the case serves as a reminder that divorce disputes can linger long after a marriage ends, particularly when finances are involved.

It also highlights how even well-known public figures can find themselves entangled in deeply personal and financially draining conflicts.

For now, Rashid is waiting for the court to take action, hoping that years of unpaid support will finally be addressed.

Jackson, meanwhile, continues to contest the claims, maintaining that his financial reality does not match the image presented by his estranged wife.

Until a ruling is made, the dispute remains unresolved, a complex and emotionally charged chapter in the personal life of a man whose name has long been associated with fame, music, and legacy.