A shocking new development has emerged in the ongoing and highly publicized drama between Kanye West and Kim Kardashian.

The rapper has now claimed that a fiery legal demand letter, which was widely reported to have been sent to Kim, was in fact a “hoax.”
This revelation adds a new twist to the bitter custody battle and public feud between the former couple, who share four children.

Earlier this week, TMZ reported that Kanye West had filed a cease and desist letter accusing Kim of exploiting their children for personal and commercial gain.
In his latest song, dropped Thursday, West upped the ante even further¿ rapping that his bitter custody battle with Kim is what 'made him a Nazi' (Kim seen on Monday at Met Gala)

The letter also alleged that Kim had left their 11-year-old daughter North unattended in a parked car during the 2025 Met Gala, sparking outrage and concern.

Kanye, 47, has repeatedly clashed with Kim, 44, over co-parenting their children—North, 11; Saint, 9; Chicago, 7; and Psalm, 5—claiming he is being unfairly kept from spending time with them.

The cease and desist letter reportedly came from a lawyer named Kathy Johnson, who was said to represent Kanye’s legal interests.

However, investigations revealed that the law office she purportedly works for, the JB Law Firm based in Palma, Spain, may not be legitimate.

The phone number listed for the firm was reportedly disconnected and previously linked to a travel agency rather than a law practice.

Kanye’s spokesperson has now categorically denied that the rapper sent any such letter.

In a statement to Page Six, the spokesperson said: “The letter is quite obviously fraudulent.

TMZ didn’t ask for comment before running the story, and this morning, they finally emailed us with second thoughts, asking if it had been a ‘publicity stunt.

’No.You fell for a hoax.”

This denial casts serious doubt on the authenticity of the letter and raises questions about who might have fabricated it.

The initial TMZ report described the letter as accusing Kim of violating Kanye’s parental rights and their divorce settlement in three major ways.

First, the letter alleged that Kim brought North West to the Met Gala and left her “unattended in a vehicle during portions of the event,” posing safety risks to their daughter.

Kim attended the Met Gala solo on May 5, 2025, and confirmed that North had traveled with her to New York City.

She told Vogue on the red carpet that she loves bringing her eldest daughter to the event so North can experience the preparations and spend time with her aunts Kendall and Kylie Jenner.

Footage shared on Kim’s social media showed North alongside her in the days leading up to the gala, further confirming their close presence during the event.

However, it remains unclear whether North was left alone in a car at any time during the gala, as the letter alleged.

Second, the letter claimed Kim denied Kanye “meaningful access” to their four children, violating their custody agreement that calls for equal parenting and shared decision-making.

The 47-year-old Grammy winner has repeatedly clashed with Kim, 44, over co-parenting their kids¿North, 11; Saint, 9; Chicago , 7; and Psalm, 5¿claiming he's being kept from spending time with them

The letter asserted that Kanye had not seen Saint West at all this year and had “unreasonably restricted” contact with the other children.

Yet photos from January show Kanye with Saint, Chicago, and Psalm on a family trip to Japan, contradicting the letter’s claim.

Third, the letter accused Kim of exploiting North for personal or commercial gain by posting images and videos of her at public events, despite Kanye’s objections.

The letter argued that this behavior disregards Kanye’s joint custodial rights and his stated opposition to the children’s public exposure.

Sources close to Kim have told TMZ that Kanye has made little effort to see the children this year.

They also said that when Kanye has sought visitation, Kim has never denied him access.

This suggests that the accusations in the letter may not reflect the reality of their co-parenting situation.

The alleged cease and desist letter came amid escalating tensions between Kanye and Kim.

In recent months, Kanye has made headlines with controversial and disturbing public statements.

Most notably, he released a song titled Heil Hitler (Hooligan Version), which featured provocative lyrics and imagery glorifying Adolf Hitler.

The music video for the song showed a group of shirtless black men draped in animal skins professing their love for Hitler.

Kanye released the song on VE Day, the 80th anniversary of Victory in Europe Day, which marked the end of fighting against Nazi Germany in World War II.

This timing added to the shock and outrage surrounding the release.

In the song, Kanye rapped about the anger he harbors due to his custody battle, claiming that the conflict “made him a Nazi.”
He expressed frustration that despite his fame and fortune, he does not get to see his children.

The song’s lyrics repeatedly included racial slurs and references to Hitler, further fueling controversy.

Kanye also referenced his new wife, Bianca Censori, in the song.

He claimed to be a “cuck,” a term used to describe a fetish involving humiliation in romantic relationships.

Bianca has been accused by some observers of “controlling” Kanye, as she often appears in near-naked ensembles and is prominently featured in his public appearances.

The ongoing feud between Kanye and Kim has been characterized by public outbursts, legal battles, and intense media scrutiny.

Now, however, a spokesperson for Kanye has issued an astonishing statement saying the musician never issued such a letter, and that TMZ 'fell for a hoax'

Their divorce and custody arrangements have been contentious, with both sides airing grievances in the press and on social media.

Kanye has previously sparked backlash for tweets in which he complained about a “white woman” controlling his Black children.

He has also accused Kim and her family of conspiring to keep him away from his kids.

Kim, meanwhile, has maintained that she supports Kanye’s relationship with the children and strives to co-parent amicably.

The latest denial of the cease and desist letter adds a new layer of complexity to the saga.

It suggests that some of the legal tactics attributed to Kanye may be fabricated or misrepresented.

This raises questions about the role of misinformation and manipulation in their very public dispute.

Legal experts have noted that if the letter were indeed fraudulent, it could constitute a serious offense, including potential identity theft or forgery.

The fact that the letter appeared to come from a dubious law firm in Spain further complicates the matter.

The public and media continue to follow the story closely, given the high-profile nature of both Kanye West and Kim Kardashian.

Their four children remain at the center of the conflict, with fans and observers hoping for a resolution that prioritizes their well-being.

In the supposedly 'fraudulent' letter, Kanye accuses Kim of violating both his parental rights and their divorce settlement in three key ways; (seen in 2019)

In the meantime, Kanye’s controversial artistic choices and public statements continue to provoke debate about mental health, celebrity culture, and the responsibilities of public figures.

Kim has largely maintained a lower profile in recent weeks, focusing on her businesses and family.

This latest twist in the legal battle underscores the volatile and unpredictable nature of their relationship.

As the public watches, the hope remains that the former couple can find common ground for the sake of their children.

The ongoing saga between Kanye West and Kim Kardashian is a stark reminder of the challenges faced by high-profile families navigating personal conflicts in the spotlight.

It also highlights the dangers of misinformation and the importance of verifying legal claims before they are amplified by the media.

As this story continues to unfold, the world will be watching to see what the next chapter holds for Kanye, Kim, and their family.