“I don’t want to look like a loser,” Patty Pimblett said, his voice tight with anger and exhaustion, “but everyone saw I was better than Justin that fight. I had to fight with a broken eye. That’s not fair, man.”
That sentence set the tone for what followed—an interview that felt less like a sports podcast and more like a courtroom indictment.
What unfolded inside Joe Rogan’s Austin studio wasn’t the usual whiskey-soaked, free-flowing fight talk. It was quiet. Heavy. Uncomfortable. Pimblett walked in wearing black wraparound sunglasses, a thick medical patch visible underneath, covering an eye doctors are still trying to save. He didn’t look like a victorious fighter. He looked like someone who had survived something.
And according to Pimblett and Rogan, what happened inside the octagon wasn’t just a dirty moment—it was something far darker.

The controversy centers on an eye poke that occurred during Pimblett’s bout with Justin Gaethje. In real time, it looked chaotic—fighters scrambling, officials shouting, commentators unsure of what they’d just seen.
But slowed down, frame by frame, the footage tells a different story.
On the podcast, Rogan had his producer pull up raw, unedited 4K footage of the exchange. Not broadcast speed. Not replay speed. Frame-by-frame.
Frozen in place, Gaethje’s hand appears with fingers curled, thumb extended—rigid, deliberate, and aimed directly at Pimblett’s eye.
Rogan, who has spent decades calling fights and training in martial arts, didn’t hedge his words.
“Nobody throws a hook like that,” he said. “Nobody. Not unless they’re trying to do damage beyond the rules.”
To Rogan, the mechanics weren’t accidental. They weren’t sloppy. They were intentional.
“It Wasn’t a Poke. It Was a Gouge.”
Pimblett’s account only intensified the reaction.
“People think it was just a poke,” he said. “It wasn’t. I felt his thumb go behind the eyeball. I heard a pop inside my head. He twisted it.”
He described immediate loss of vision, pressure, disorientation—and the realization that he would have to fight the remaining rounds essentially blind.
“I knew I was winning the exchanges,” Pimblett added. “He knew he was gassing. He knew he couldn’t knock me out. So he made a decision.”
That decision, Pimblett claims, wasn’t about survival—it was about desperation.
The Audio That Lit the Match
If the video raised eyebrows, the alleged audio detonated the room.
Rogan claimed that enhanced audio—scrubbed from the live broadcast—captured Gaethje’s corner between rounds. According to Rogan, the coach can be heard saying:
“You’re losing the range. You have to take his vision. Use the thumb if you have to.”
Rogan didn’t mince words.
“That’s not coaching,” he said, slamming his fist on the desk. “That’s solicitation of a felony.”
Whether that audio withstands official scrutiny remains to be seen. But in the moment, it reframed the controversy—from a foul in a fight to an accusation of intent.
From Dirty Tactic to Something Bigger
Then came the part that pushed the conversation beyond the cage.
Rogan pulled up betting data showing a sudden, dramatic spike in money placed on an obscure prop bet: that the fight would end via disqualification or foul. The surge reportedly occurred minutes before walkouts.
“Who bets seven figures on that?” Rogan asked. “Unless they know something.”
No proof of wrongdoing has been established. No charges have been filed. But the implication was clear: if a foul was intentional—and if people knew it was coming—the issue stops being about sportsmanship and starts becoming about integrity.
A Career, A Legacy, A Line Crossed
Justin Gaethje’s résumé is not in question. He has fought—and beaten—some of the most dangerous men in MMA history. His reputation as violence incarnate was earned over years of wars.
That’s what makes the allegations so polarizing.
To Pimblett, the issue isn’t just the injury. It’s the legacy.
“He couldn’t beat me fair,” Pimblett said. “So he chose another way.”
Gaethje has not publicly responded to the specific claims made on the podcast. The UFC has yet to announce any additional disciplinary action beyond what has already occurred.
“I’ll Be Back”
Pimblett ended the episode quietly, without theatrics.
“I’ll be back with one eye or two,” he said. “I’ll get the surgery. And I’ll get my belt.”
Whether this controversy fades or explodes into something larger—investigations, lawsuits, permanent consequences—remains unknown.
What is clear is that the conversation has changed.
This is no longer just about who won a fight.
It’s about intent.
About rules.
About how far a competitor is willing to go when they realize they’re losing.
And now, the question belongs to the fans:
Was this an accident in the chaos of combat—or something that crossed a line the sport can’t afford to ignore?
The fallout is only beginning.
News
🎰 Dana White told to cut Paddy Pimblett after UFC 324 defeat: ‘He has zero MMA skills’
Dana White has been advised to cut Paddy Pimblett from the UFC roster after what one top contender viewed as…
🎰 The Rosary Misunderstood: Why So Many Pray It Without Power—and How to Pray It Right
A mother named Clara stood before Pope Leo XIV with tears streaming down her face. Her husband was slowly dying…
🎰 The Extraordinary Life of Padre Pio – The Origins and The Stigmata
Catholic Hearts presents the extraordinary life of Padre Pio, part one. Two world wars ravaged the 20th century. Faith was…
🎰 The Man in White: Why Christianity Is Exploding in Iran Despite Brutal Persecution
Right now, Iran is a country where owning a Bible can lead to prison. Churches are sealed with padlocks. Pastors…
🎰 Hindu Monk Dies and Returns With a SHOCKING Message From Jesus For all Unbelievers and Believers
My name is Avind. I was once known as Swami Aravindananda. For 33 years, I lived as a Hindu monk…
🎰 When Heaven Went Dark: China, the Cross, and the Forgotten Records of History
For nearly two thousand years, historians and skeptics have posed a pointed—almost embarrassing—question to Christians: if the sky truly went…
End of content
No more pages to load






