Before Death, Bette Davis COMPLETELY EXPOSED Joan Crawford
In the golden haze of Hollywood’s studio era, few rivalries burned as fiercely as that between Bette Davis and Joan Crawford.
Their animosity was legendary, a relentless clash of wills and talents that spanned decades, studios, and screen roles.
It was a battle for the crown in a kingdom that only had room for one queen.

Their feud began in the 1930s, fueled by a shared ambition and a love triangle involving actor Franchot Tone.
Davis, known for her fierce independence and willingness to portray flawed, complex women, saw Crawford as a manufactured star who wielded her sexuality as a weapon.
Crawford, meanwhile, regarded Davis’s intensity as ungraceful and preferred to maintain her polished, glamorous image.
The rivalry was personal and professional, manifesting in biting remarks and strategic gestures—Crawford sending insincere congratulatory gifts, Davis publicly deriding Crawford’s charm as superficial.
The 1940s intensified the conflict when Crawford defected from MGM to Warner Bros., Davis’s home turf.
The two shared adjacent dressing rooms but communicated only through assistants, their rivalry so palpable it disrupted production.
The competition peaked with Mildred Pierce (1945), a role Davis rejected but Crawford seized, delivering a career-defining performance.
Crawford’s theatrical Oscar acceptance from her bed during a bout of “pneumonia” infuriated Davis, who saw it as vulgar spectacle overshadowing true artistry.
By the 1950s, both women faced Hollywood’s cruel ageism, relegated to “box office poison” status.
Desperate for a comeback, they agreed to star together in Whatever Happened to Baby Jane? (1962).
![]()
The set became a battleground of psychological warfare: Davis’s grotesque makeup clashed with Crawford’s insistence on maintaining star glamour; physical altercations left Crawford injured; and each vied for crew loyalty.
Their hatred seeped into the film, creating a chilling authenticity that revived their careers but deepened their enmity.
The 1963 Academy Awards marked the ultimate betrayal.
Davis, nominated for Best Actress, was poised for a historic third Oscar.
Crawford, snubbed, orchestrated a stunning ruse—offering to accept the award on behalf of winner Anne Bancroft, then stealing the spotlight with a glamorous, unscripted appearance.
Davis was left speechless, humiliated by what she called a “perfect crime.”

This act cemented Crawford’s reputation as a master manipulator and Davis’s as the wronged artist.
Their feud never softened.
When cast for the sequel Hush… Hush, Sweet Charlotte, Crawford feigned illness to avoid working with Davis, fearing a plot to undermine her.
They never appeared together again.
Crawford died in 1977, and Davis’s reaction was brutally honest: “You should never say bad things about the dead, only good. Joan Crawford is dead. Good.”
Davis spent her remaining years dismantling Crawford’s carefully constructed public image, revealing a woman who used her children and sexuality as tools for survival and fame.

The release of Mommie Dearest in 1978, penned by Crawford’s daughter Christina, exposed the darker side of Crawford’s life—abuse and alcoholism—vindicating Davis’s suspicions about Crawford’s facade.
Yet Davis’s own daughter later published a tell-all portraying Davis as a harsh, alcoholic mother, illustrating the brutal costs of their public and private battles.
In their twilight years, Crawford withdrew into reclusion, clinging to her glamorous myth, while Davis embraced her legacy as a gritty, authentic actress, unafraid to show every wrinkle earned.
They were two sides of the same coin—victims and victors of a studio system that demanded perfection and pitted women against each other for survival.
Bette Davis and Joan Crawford’s rivalry was more than personal animosity; it was a reflection of Hollywood’s ruthless machinery.
Their war illuminated the pressures faced by women in a male-dominated industry and left a legacy of cinematic brilliance and bitter legend.
When Davis finally passed in 1989, the world lost not just an icon but the last living witness to a feud that defined an era of grit, glamour, and unyielding ambition.
News
He Built A Time Machine In His Garage And Vanished In 1997—Then Returned 25 Years Later..
.
The Man Who Slipped Out of Reality: The Disturbing Case of Mike Markham In January 1995, a little-known electrical tinkerer…
Satan, Style, and Sanctification: How Modern Fashion Is Quietly Rewriting Biblical Modesty
Why Are Sanctified People Wearing Skin-Tight Clothing? In a passionate and confrontational message, a preacher raises a question that many…
“Take the Baby Out”? Bishop Marvin Sapp’s Sermon Sparks Outrage and Divides the Church Again
Bishop Marvin Sapp Under Fire Again Over the “Take the Baby Out” Moment Bishop Marvin Sapp is no stranger to…
Black Pastors Explode Over Jamal Bryant, Morehouse College, and What They Call the “Silencing” of the Church
Black Pastors Sound the Alarm on Jamal Bryant, Morehouse, and the Direction of the Church A growing chorus of Black…
“They Disappointed Everybody”: Why Bishop Noel Jones Says Mega Churches Won’t Survive Past 2026
Bishop Noel Jones Warns: The Era of Mega Churches Is Ending In a moment that has rapidly gone viral across…
Pastor Says Sorry to LGBT Community — Christians Erupt Over What Came Next
When a Pastor’s Apology Turned the Church World Upside Down In an era where religious institutions are increasingly scrutinized, one…
End of content
No more pages to load






