Bishop Patrick Wooden Stands Firm as Stephen A. Smith Backpedals on Comments About Jasmine Crockett

Recently, a storm erupted around Congresswoman Jasmine Crockett’s public conduct, fueled by candid remarks from two influential Black voices: Bishop Patrick Wooden and ESPN commentator Stephen A. Smith.

Both men initially criticized Crockett for what they saw as a damaging and counterproductive persona—one that, despite her middle-class upbringing and educational achievements, leaned into stereotypes that do not uplift the Black community.

Bishop Wooden, a respected religious leader from Raleigh, North Carolina, did not mince words.

He condemned Crockett’s “ghetto ratchet queen” persona and expressed disappointment that someone with her background and platform would adopt such a demeanor.

Wooden argued that Black leaders must embody strength, intelligence, and dignity, especially when serving as role models for younger generations.

“We want our kids to be the best, to be educated, informed, and great,” he said, underscoring the responsibility public figures carry.

Stephen A. Smith initially voiced similar concerns, questioning whether Crockett’s style and language—marked by profanity and flamboyance in Congressional hearings and social media—were appropriate for someone in her position.

He highlighted the importance of efficacy and professionalism in public office and lamented that Crockett’s behavior could detract from her ability to serve her constituents effectively.

However, unlike Bishop Wooden, Smith soon backpedaled.

Facing backlash and pressure from his media employers and critics accusing him of disrespect and misogyny, Smith issued an apology.

He framed his comments as a misunderstanding and expressed regret for any offense caused, though many observers felt his apology was more about appeasing his “handlers” than a genuine change of heart.

This contrast between the two men has sparked intense discussion.

Many praise Bishop Wooden’s unwavering stance as a sign of integrity and courage, especially given his recent back surgery and long-standing commitment to the community.

Others see Smith’s reversal as emblematic of the challenges Black commentators face in navigating corporate media pressures and cancel culture.

The core of the debate revolves around representation and respectability politics within the Black community.

Both men agree on the importance of Black women achieving success and influence, but they differ sharply on how that success should be presented.

Wooden and Smith’s original critiques focused on the idea that adopting certain behaviors and language undermines the progress and image of Black leaders, potentially reinforcing harmful stereotypes.

Critics of the backlash against Crockett argue that such expectations can be limiting and dismissive of authentic self-expression.

They contend that Black women, like all individuals, should have the freedom to express themselves in ways that feel true to their identities without being judged harshly for it.

Despite the controversy, both men acknowledged Crockett’s intelligence and accomplishments.

Wooden specifically called for respect toward her achievements, even as he challenged her public persona.

Smith, too, expressed respect for Crockett and other prominent Black women, emphasizing that his critique was about presentation, not character.

The episode also highlights broader issues about the pressures Black public figures face.

Smith’s apology illustrates how media personalities often have to balance personal opinions with corporate interests and public expectations.

Meanwhile, Wooden’s refusal to retract his comments shows a different kind of leadership—one rooted in conviction and faith.

Ultimately, this clash raises important questions: How should Black leaders navigate the complex terrain of public perception, authenticity, and community expectations? What does it mean to uplift without conforming to narrow standards? And how can honest dialogue about these issues happen without fear of censorship or backlash?

As the conversation continues, voices like Bishop Wooden’s remind us that standing firm in one’s beliefs, even when unpopular, can be a powerful act of leadership.

Meanwhile, Smith’s experience serves as a cautionary tale about the costs of speaking truth in today’s media landscape.