Bishop Earl Carter’s Unfiltered Truth Bombs on COGIC and Church Leadership: What He Really Said

In a passionate and unrestrained message, Bishop Earl Carter delivered a scathing critique of certain elements within the Church of God in Christ (COGIC) and broader church leadership.

Addressing issues of hypocrisy, moral failure, and weak leadership, Carter’s sermon was a clarion call for spiritual integrity and reform.

His remarks, laced with biblical references and personal conviction, challenge the status quo and demand accountability from those who hold positions of power within the church.

Bishop Carter began by emphasizing that the true church must reside in the heart, not merely in denominational affiliation.

He urged believers to “come out from among them”—not just from the secular world but from within corrupt church systems plagued by hypocrisy, lies, and immoral behavior.

Drawing a parallel to Jesus’ cleansing of the temple, Carter reminded listeners that Jesus was often harsher on religious leaders than on the general populace, exposing their deceit and corruption.

This message was not without controversy.

Carter’s blunt language, including harsh condemnations of homosexuality and accusations against specific leaders, ignited debates about the tone and content of his preaching.

However, he clarified that while he did not apologize for speaking the truth, he regretted the anger and personal attacks that accompanied his delivery.

His stance remains firm: no one is above Scripture, and when church leaders violate biblical teachings, they must be called out.

One of the most striking portions of Carter’s message involved his critique of leadership within COGIC.

He recounted his own ordination under Bishop O.T.Jones Sr. and Jr., whom he described as men of God without scandal.

Contrasting that with the current state of the church, he lamented the rise of “switching” leaders—those who compromise or deviate from biblical standards—and “homongers,” a term he used to describe individuals involved in homosexual acts within the church leadership.

Carter specifically named individuals and churches, accusing them of moral failures and deception.

Carter’s message extended beyond mere condemnation; it was a call for repentance and reform.

He cited Ephesians 5:11, urging believers to “have no fellowship with the unfruitful works of darkness, but rather reprove them.”

To “reprove” means to expose, criticize, and judge, and Carter argued that this biblical mandate justifies his outspoken approach.

He emphasized that true prophets serve to correct and expose wrongdoing, not to shield sin under the guise of anointing or status.

Throughout his sermon, Carter underscored the destructive impact of weak leadership on congregations, warning that “if the pastor’s limping, you going to limp.”

This metaphor illustrated how flawed leaders influence their followers negatively, perpetuating cycles of spiritual and moral failure.

He encouraged believers to be discerning about their leaders, stressing that allegiance to a denomination should never come at the expense of biblical truth.

Carter also addressed the broader cultural and spiritual challenges facing the church today.

He lamented the presence of “hustlers, gangsters, tricksters, and homosexuals” in the church, asserting that such elements corrupt the body of Christ and hinder genuine spiritual growth.

He praised social media for exposing these issues, suggesting that this era is a kairos moment—a divine opportunity for the church to confront and correct its failings.

Biblical references were woven throughout Carter’s sermon, reinforcing his points with scriptural authority.

He cited Ezekiel 33:7-9, which calls watchmen to warn the wicked or bear responsibility for their blood, and 2 Timothy 4:2, urging preachers to “reprove, rebuke, exhort with all longsuffering and doctrine.”

These verses framed his message as a fulfillment of a prophetic duty rather than personal attack.

In closing, Bishop Earl Carter’s sermon is a stark reminder that spiritual leadership carries immense responsibility and that accountability is essential for the health of the church.

His unapologetic stance on confronting sin and hypocrisy challenges believers and leaders alike to examine their hearts and their practices.

Whether one agrees with his methods or not, his message compels the church to reckon with uncomfortable truths and consider the path toward genuine revival and holiness.