Authorities allege Kelley violated a court-ordered gag order by posting private information about Scott, their children, and family members on social media.

In a startling development in the ongoing custody and divorce battle between actor Scott Wolf and his estranged wife Kelley Wolf, Utah authorities arrested Kelley Wolf, 48, late Tuesday, August 26, on charges of electronic communication harassment and electronic disclosure of personal identifying information.

The charges come amid allegations that Kelley used social media to publish private information about Scott, family members, and even their three children in violation of a court-ordered gag provision.

Kelley was detained at her rented home in Summit County and is being held at the Summit County Jail; at the time of reporting, no formal charges had been filed, no bail had been set, and it remained unclear if she had secured legal representation.

Prior to her arrest, Kelley Wolf posted on Instagram Stories, expressing confusion and fear about law enforcement’s actions.

“The police are at my house to arrest me. I have no idea why,” she wrote, adding, “I am not suicidal. I am no danger to anyone. I have done nothing. I am so scared. So confused.”

However, investigators allege that her recent online activity, which included doxxing family members, posting personal texts, and making false accusations against Scott, contributed directly to her detention.

The background of the dispute is steeped in a high-profile, contentious divorce. Scott Wolf, 57, known for his roles in *Party of Five* and other television projects, and Kelley Wolf were married for 21 years before Kelley initiated separation proceedings in June 2025.

Scott filed for divorce on June 10. The couple shares three children: Jackson, 16, Miller, 12, and Lucy, 11.

As part of temporary court orders, Scott holds sole physical custody and decision-making authority over the children, while Kelley is granted supervised parenting rights, including three scheduled supervised phone or video calls per week, with the ability to respond only if the children initiate additional contact.

A key element cited in Kelley’s arrest is a court-issued gag order meant to protect the family from public conflict.

Signed by a Utah judge on August 26 and stemming from a prior temporary agreement reviewed on August 4 and finalized on August 22, the order prohibited both parties from posting online about one another, their marriage, their children, or the divorce.

Additionally, it barred either parent from making disparaging remarks to the children in any form.

Authorities allege Kelley repeatedly violated these orders. In a series of confrontational social media posts leading up to her arrest, she shared private communications with Scott, made accusations of abuse, and published sensitive information about friends and family members.

Investigators claim these actions meet the legal threshold for electronic harassment and unauthorized disclosure of personal identifying information, commonly referred to as doxxing.

Such violations, especially in the context of a protective gag order, are taken seriously by Utah law enforcement.

Scott Wolf has publicly responded to the arrest, asserting that Kelley’s allegations against him were false and potentially harmful.

In an interview, he stated, “She has described to me her plans to ‘make claims’ about me, although she also admitted, ‘I do not believe they’re true,’ in order to gain an advantage in what she sees as a ‘battle’ in court, and in the court of public opinion.”

He provided text messages allegedly sent by Kelley in which she outlined her strategy to produce accusations about him to influence custody proceedings.

Scott emphasized the importance of clarifying intentions to the public and urged respect for the family’s privacy, especially regarding the children.

Those familiar with the family described a tense and complex situation. Sources say that Kelley had been increasingly vocal online in recent weeks, targeting Scott and others connected to the family.

Meanwhile, Scott has maintained that he is focused on protecting the welfare of their three children and adhering to court mandates, despite the strain caused by the public nature of the conflict.

The legal ramifications of Kelley Wolf’s arrest are significant. Electronic harassment and doxxing are considered serious offenses under Utah law, carrying potential penalties that range from fines to imprisonment, depending on the severity and intent of the violations.

Court observers note that the case underscores the growing challenges courts face in managing disputes involving social media, particularly when children are involved and temporary custody orders are in place.

As of late August 27, 2025, the case remains ongoing. Kelley Wolf has yet to be formally charged in court, and law enforcement has not publicly confirmed if she has retained counsel.

Scott Wolf continues to manage temporary sole custody and has appealed to media outlets and the public to respect the family’s privacy, emphasizing that the children should remain shielded from online disputes.

Observers following the case note that the incident highlights broader concerns around the use of social media during contentious family and custody proceedings.

Legal experts have increasingly cautioned parents about the potential consequences of posting personal, sensitive, or disparaging content online, particularly when court orders explicitly prohibit such actions.

As this high-profile case unfolds, the intersection of celebrity, social media, and legal accountability remains in focus.

For the Wolf family, the coming weeks may involve complex court hearings, potential criminal charges, and ongoing scrutiny from both media and the public, all while navigating the sensitive dynamics of co-parenting three minor children amid ongoing divorce proceedings.

The arrest of Kelley Wolf, coming amid a long-standing public dispute with Scott Wolf, has sent shockwaves through social media and entertainment circles,

serving as a cautionary tale about the consequences of online actions and the enduring impact of family law interventions.