Gibson condemned King’s social media remarks, framing them as divisive and disrespectful toward Kirk, whom he described as a “true American patriot.”

In the wake of the tragic murder of conservative commentator Charlie Kirk on September 10, 2025, the political landscape has been shaken, igniting fierce debates and backlash against various public figures.

The incident, which has drawn widespread media attention, has prompted a wave of reactions from celebrities, particularly targeting renowned author Stephen King.

Mel Gibson, a prominent actor known for his outspoken views, has emerged as a vocal critic of King, condemning his remarks about Kirk and calling for accountability in the entertainment industry.

Charlie Kirk, a well-known figure in conservative circles, was shot and killed in what authorities described as a targeted attack by Tyler Robinson, a man with a controversial history.

The event has not only sparked outrage among Kirk’s supporters but has also led to intense scrutiny of those who have commented on the situation, particularly King, who has faced accusations of mocking Kirk in the aftermath of his death.

As the nation grapples with the emotional fallout from this tragedy, Gibson’s comments have added fuel to an already heated discourse.

During an online broadcast, Gibson expressed his deep dismay over the way Kirk’s death has been handled by some members of the media and the entertainment industry.

“This is creating a lot of pushback against specific celebrities and personalities,” Gibson stated, highlighting how King has allegedly spread misinformation about Kirk.

He emphasized the importance of respecting the memory of Kirk, who he described as a “true American patriot” who championed freedom of speech and sought to understand diverse viewpoints.

Gibson did not hold back in his criticism of King, labeling his behavior as “disgusting.” He pointed out that King’s comments on social media, particularly on X (formerly Twitter), have not only been hurtful but have also contributed to a culture of division and animosity.

“I think everyone knows this as much as I do,” Gibson said. “To see people like Stephen King lying about Charlie, who was also a true American patriot, is irredeemable as far as I’m concerned.”

The backlash against King has been swift, with many fans and fellow artists expressing their disappointment.

Gibson noted that some individuals have even resorted to boycotting King’s works, discarding his books, and avoiding his film adaptations, including the upcoming movie “The Long Walk,” which is based on one of King’s novels.

“Never would I have thought that we would be living in a time where a man who was assassinated would be mocked, lied about, and politicized on social media,” Gibson lamented, questioning the moral compass of those who engage in such behavior.

In his remarks, Gibson also reflected on his own past mistakes, acknowledging the controversies that have surrounded him throughout his career.

He stated, “I owned it and accepted it and decided to improve myself.” This admission of accountability was framed as a contrast to what he perceives as King’s lack of remorse.

Gibson urged King to take a step back from social media and reflect on his actions, suggesting that the author has become “irrecoverable” in the eyes of many due to his recent statements.

The public’s reaction to Gibson’s comments has been mixed. While some supporters laud his willingness to speak out against perceived injustices, others argue that his own history of controversial remarks complicates his position.

Nevertheless, Gibson’s advocacy for Kirk has resonated with a segment of the population that feels similarly outraged by King’s comments.

The actor’s passionate defense of Kirk’s legacy serves as a rallying cry for those who believe in the importance of upholding respect for the deceased, regardless of political affiliations.

As the situation continues to unfold, the entertainment industry finds itself at a crossroads.

The incident has reignited discussions about the responsibility of public figures in the wake of tragedies, particularly regarding their influence on public opinion and the potential consequences of their words.

Gibson’s call for accountability may resonate with those who feel that celebrities should be held to a higher standard when discussing sensitive topics, especially in the context of a violent crime that has left a community in mourning.

In conclusion, Mel Gibson’s outspoken criticism of Stephen King following the death of Charlie Kirk highlights the complex interplay between celebrity culture, political discourse, and social media dynamics.

As the nation processes the implications of Kirk’s murder, the conversations surrounding accountability and respect for the deceased will likely continue to evolve.

The fallout from this incident serves as a reminder of the power of words and the responsibility that comes with public influence, challenging both celebrities and audiences to reflect on their roles in shaping societal narratives.