💣 UNFILTERED! Gutfeld & Maher TEAM UP to EXPOSE Whoopi Goldberg on National TV—Her Darkest Secrets Air Out LIVE! 😳🔥

In a media moment destined to dominate headlines for weeks, Greg Gutfeld and Bill Maher unleashed a brutal, no-holds-barred critique of Whoopi Goldberg during a heated live discussion that has left the internet—and the entertainment world—completely shaken.

The controversial on-air takedown didn’t just catch viewers off guard; it redefined what we thought we knew about the fragile alliances and buried tensions between Hollywood’s loudest voices.

The unexpected roast happened during a special crossover panel where Maher, typically seen as a centrist firebrand with a liberal past, appeared alongside Fox News’ sharp-tongued Greg Gutfeld.

Though often on opposing sides of the ideological fence, the two found shocking common ground: their shared criticism of Goldberg’s influence, hypocrisy, and unchecked presence on The View.

Gutfeld fired the first salvo, sarcastically referring to Whoopi as the “unimpeachable queen of daytime delusion,” accusing her of hiding behind the label of “comedian-turned-host” to shield herself from real accountability.

Maher, typically more measured in his critiques of fellow liberals, didn’t hold back either.

“She used to be sharp, fearless, funny,” he said, with a biting edge.

“Now it’s like watching a parody of herself, only she’s dead serious.

When did Whoopi become the establishment she used to mock?” That line alone triggered gasps both in-studio and online, with clips of the exchange going viral within minutes.

The core of their accusations? Gutfeld and Maher accused Goldberg of weaponizing identity politics, suppressing genuine dialogue, and creating an ideological echo chamber on The View—a show that was once known for fiery, diverse debate, but which now, according to them, exists as a mouthpiece for safe, scripted liberal narratives.

“She doesn’t debate, she dismisses,” Gutfeld snapped.

“Every opinion she doesn’t like is ‘dangerous’ or ‘racist’ or ‘misinformed.

’ Meanwhile, her own past statements get a free pass.

That “past” is precisely what the duo unearthed.

In a moment of on-air chaos, they referenced Goldberg’s multiple controversies—from her eyebrow-raising comments on the Holocaust, which forced a temporary suspension from The View, to past defenses of disgraced figures in Hollywood.

Maher especially criticized what he called a “pattern of performative contrition”—moments where Whoopi would apologize or clarify statements only after backlash reached critical mass, not because she actually saw fault in them.

“She plays the wise elder card,” Maher said, “but when she messes up, suddenly she’s the victim.

That’s not growth, that’s manipulation.

Viewers across the political spectrum were stunned—not just by the content, but by the collaboration.

These are two men with wildly different followings and agendas, yet here they were, united in their dismantling of one of daytime television’s most entrenched voices.

And while Whoopi wasn’t present to defend herself, the timing and targeting felt anything but accidental.

The internet, of course, erupted.

Fans of Goldberg rushed to her defense, calling the segment a coordinated smear designed to silence a powerful Black woman unafraid to speak her mind.

“This is nothing but misogynoir dressed up as critique,” one viral tweet read.

Others questioned why Goldberg was being singled out when other daytime hosts have said far worse with far fewer consequences.

Still, even some of her longtime defenders admitted that the critiques—however harsh—were not entirely baseless.

“There’s a difference between attacking someone and holding them accountable,” said one media analyst.

“What Gutfeld and Maher did was uncomfortable, yes—but it also raised valid questions about how much unchecked power and platform Whoopi has been allowed to wield.

Meanwhile, producers at The View have reportedly gone into crisis mode, unsure whether to address the segment or ignore it altogether.

Insiders say that Goldberg was “blindsided and furious,” and that tensions backstage are running high as execs scramble to protect the show’s brand without escalating the feud further.

Rumors are already swirling that a retaliatory monologue or segment may be in the works, with Whoopi expected to “clap back” in classic fashion.

And here’s the twist no one saw coming: despite the venom on air, Maher later told a podcast host that he still has “deep respect” for Whoopi’s career, adding, “That doesn’t mean she’s beyond criticism.

” Whether that’s a genuine sentiment or a preemptive damage control tactic remains to be seen.

What’s certain is this: we are witnessing a seismic shift in how celebrity commentators and cultural gatekeepers interact.

The old rules—where ideological allies stayed loyal and criticism remained polite—are crumbling.

In their place is a new battleground where even the most iconic figures are vulnerable to public takedowns, especially when two media titans like Maher and Gutfeld decide to team up and flip the script.

In an age where reputations can be destroyed in a single segment, Whoopi Goldberg now finds herself in unfamiliar territory: on the defensive, caught in the crossfire, and forced to answer questions she may have thought she was too powerful to face.