Shocking Statement 😱: Justin Baldoni’s Lawyer Calls Blake Lively’s Court Win a “Cover-Up” – The Real Truth Behind the Dismissal!

In a shocking turn of events that’s reigniting one of the most talked-about legal showdowns in Hollywood, Justin Baldoni’s attorney has come forward with a fiery rebuttal following Blake Lively’s courtroom win.

Though the court may have dismissed Baldoni’s claims against the Gossip Girl star, the Jane the Virgin actor’s legal team says the dismissal isn’t what it seems—and they’re calling the entire outcome a “false victory.

In a statement released late Tuesday afternoon, Baldoni’s lead counsel slammed the ruling and accused Lively’s legal team of manipulating public perception.

“The dismissal of this case was procedural, not substantive,” the lawyer said.

“There was no factual determination made regarding our claims.

To portray this as a sweeping vindication is legally inaccurate—and frankly, misleading.

Translation? According to Baldoni’s side, Lively didn’t win so much as she got a temporary pass on a technicality.

The court’s decision, they claim, was based on jurisdictional or procedural grounds—perhaps a missed filing deadline or an issue with how the case was structured—not a judgment on whether the claims had merit.

If true, that means the accusations could, in theory, be refiled.

This new narrative throws a major wrench in what had looked like a clean win for Lively, who issued a calm and polished statement after the case’s dismissal, saying she was “relieved the matter is now behind us.

” But if Baldoni’s legal team is to be believed, that relief may be premature—and the legal fight might just be shifting into a new gear.

What exactly was Baldoni accusing Lively of? Court documents, though heavily redacted, reportedly pointed to professional sabotage tied to a creative development deal between the two stars.

According to inside sources, both were linked to a major streaming project involving themes of mental health and emotional vulnerability—an arena both actors are passionate about.

But somewhere along the way, that collaboration spiraled into chaos.

Baldoni believed Lively had deliberately undermined the project behind closed doors, potentially costing him millions and damaging his credibility in the industry.

Lively’s camp has denied all allegations from the beginning and continues to stand by the court’s dismissal as a full exoneration.

“There was no wrongdoing, and the court’s decision confirms that,” her rep said earlier this week.

But Baldoni’s lawyer is now publicly challenging that interpretation, saying the media and public are being “fed a half-truth designed to protect reputations, not reveal them.

Legal experts are weighing in, and reactions are divided.

Some attorneys suggest Baldoni’s team is engaging in damage control, spinning a clear loss into a grey-area controversy to save face.

Others argue the distinction between a procedural and substantive dismissal is legitimate—and potentially grounds for appeal or refiling.

“A procedural dismissal doesn’t necessarily mean the claims were baseless,” said celebrity legal analyst Dana Mornell.

“It just means the court didn’t weigh in on the facts.

If Baldoni’s lawyers tighten up the paperwork, they could be back.

But why go public now? The answer may lie in the court of public opinion, where perception often outweighs precedent.

By calling Lively’s win “false,” Baldoni’s team is trying to reclaim the narrative—and possibly signal that the fight is far from over.

In an industry where reputation is currency, a public statement can carry just as much weight as a court ruling.

Fans are torn.

On social media, the hashtag #TeamBlake continues to trend, with supporters praising her poise and calling the case “a desperate move” by Baldoni.

Others, however, are now second-guessing their assumptions.

“Wait, so the judge didn’t even rule on whether she did anything wrong? That’s sus,” one Twitter user posted.

Another wrote, “I’m not saying she’s guilty, but something clearly went down.

Otherwise, why all the drama?”

Fueling the fire are rumors that Baldoni might soon give a tell-all interview or release a video statement to “set the record straight.

” One insider close to the actor hinted that he’s “frustrated by how the truth has been distorted” and “ready to speak out directly, without legal filters.

” If that happens, the next chapter of this feud could be even messier than the courtroom phase.

As of now, Blake Lively’s team is staying quiet in response to the latest claims—but that silence may not last long.

In Hollywood, public silence often signals private strategizing.

Whether that means legal retaliation, PR countermeasures, or simply ignoring the noise remains to be seen.

What is clear is that this saga is far from finished.

With new statements, lingering accusations, and the looming threat of refiling, the Baldwin–Lively case might be entering a more volatile phase.

And while the legal verdict may be stamped and filed, the verdict in the court of public opinion is still wide open.

Stay tuned—because this legal drama is nowhere near its final scene.