In his May 15, 2025, broadcast of *No Spin News*, Bill O’Reilly tackled the deep divisions plaguing the United States, the ongoing geopolitical tensions involving Russia and Ukraine, and the complex realities shaping American politics today.

His commentary reflects a critical view of cultural fragmentation, misinformation, and the challenges of leadership in an era marked by ideological polarization and global uncertainty.

O’Reilly opened by lamenting the loss of national unity that once defined the United States, particularly during World War II when nearly all Americans united against fascism.

Today, he estimates the nation is split roughly 60/40 between “traditional Americans” and those who are dissatisfied or hostile toward the country as it stands.

This division, he argues, is compounded by a widespread rejection of objective truth.

He describes a “delusional bubble” in which many Americans prefer to avoid reality, seeking comfort in misinformation, narcotics, or escapism rather than confronting the facts.

According to O’Reilly, attempts to reason with people entrenched in these false beliefs often fail, as they cling to narratives that align with their biases regardless of evidence.

This phenomenon, he warns, undermines social cohesion and fuels irrational behavior on both ends of the political spectrum.

O’Reilly contrasts this with his upbringing, where clear notions of right and wrong were instilled through family and Catholic education.

He suggests that secular society has eroded these moral absolutes, leading to a permissive culture where individual choice is prioritized even when it causes harm.

This moral relativism, he contends, is a root cause of societal dysfunction.

A focal point in O’Reilly’s commentary was the recent House Appropriations Committee hearing where Robert Kennedy Jr., Secretary of Health and Human Services, testified amid protests from radical left-wing activists.

O’Reilly denounced the disruptive behavior of protesters like Ben Cohen, co-founder of Ben & Jerry’s, who accused Congress of cutting Medicaid funding to redirect money toward bombing children in Gaza.

O’Reilly refuted these claims, stating there have been no Medicaid cuts, only proposed reforms to address waste.

Furthermore, he emphasized that U.S.funds are not being diverted to support military actions harming civilians but rather that Israel is defending itself against Hamas terrorists who hide among civilians in Gaza.

He criticized the media and political left for accepting and amplifying such “delusional” narratives without scrutiny.

The commentator also highlighted the failed U.S.effort to deliver food aid to Gaza via a platform built in the Mediterranean Sea.

Despite intentions to feed half a million people monthly, the project collapsed amid violence and theft by Hamas militants, forcing a U.S.military evacuation.

O’Reilly used this example to illustrate the complexity and chaos surrounding humanitarian efforts in conflict zones and the misrepresentation of facts by critics.

Turning to international affairs, O’Reilly discussed the recent aborted peace talks between Russia and Ukraine in Turkey.

He noted that Russian President Vladimir Putin refused to attend, undermining any chance of a ceasefire.

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky did appear, but without Putin or U.S.Secretary of State Marco Rubio, the talks were effectively dead on arrival.

O’Reilly expressed surprise at Putin’s intransigence, given Russia’s heavy losses and international isolation.

He argued that only harsher sanctions and increased military support for Ukraine from the U.S.and Europe would pressure Putin to negotiate seriously.

He urged the Biden administration and its allies to ramp up weapon deliveries and sanctions to make the conflict as painful as possible for Russia.

He also mentioned his forthcoming book, *Confronting Evil*, which explores the mindset of tyrants like Putin who disregard human life to maintain power.

O’Reilly framed the Ukraine war as a clear example of this ruthless calculus, emphasizing the need for a firm stance against such regimes.

On the domestic front, O’Reilly touched on several political and economic topics.

He speculated on former President Donald Trump’s current whereabouts and hinted at Trump’s likely return to U.S.politics after a successful economic trip to the Gulf.

O’Reilly advised caution regarding gifts from foreign governments, such as the proposed plane loan from Qatar to Trump, suggesting loans are preferable to outright gifts.

He addressed the national debt, clarifying that while the U.S.owes $37 trillion, this figure is a collective national obligation rather than individual debt.

He also dismissed the long-standing Democratic critique of “tax cuts for the rich” as an outdated political slogan lacking substance.

O’Reilly praised the traditional American values of self-sufficiency and personal responsibility, contrasting them with what he sees as a growing entitlement mentality fostered by welfare programs since the Great Society era.

He warned that this shift from gratitude to entitlement is a dangerous development for the country’s social fabric.

Regarding food bank cutbacks, O’Reilly acknowledged potential local impacts but emphasized that federal spending cuts are necessary to control the budget.

He expressed support for pending tax legislation aimed at providing relief to small businesses, noting that Democrats oppose it by labeling it a giveaway to the wealthy.

Toward the end of his commentary, O’Reilly shared personal news about his son Spencer’s academic achievements and future plans, including a master’s degree in American government from Georgetown University.

He expressed pride and optimism about Spencer’s potential to contribute meaningfully to the country’s future.

O’Reilly also promoted his merchandise and books, encouraging viewers to support his work and engage with his community of followers.

He emphasized the importance of staying informed and involved in current affairs.

Bill O’Reilly’s May 2025 *No Spin News* broadcast painted a picture of a nation and world grappling with deep divisions, misinformation, and geopolitical strife.

His commentary called for a return to clear values, respect for facts, and decisive action against tyranny and chaos.

Whether addressing domestic cultural shifts or international conflicts, O’Reilly emphasized the need for strength, clarity, and perseverance in confronting the challenges of our time.

As America faces uncertain political and economic terrain, voices like O’Reilly’s resonate with those seeking order and truth amid the noise.

His insights invite reflection on how individuals and leaders alike can navigate the complexities of modern life while holding fast to principles that have long defined the nation.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.