Miley Cyrus Sued Over Hit Single "Flowers" | Miley Cyrus Faces Copyright Allegations

Miley Cyrus, one of the biggest pop stars in the world, is currently at the center of a significant legal controversy involving her 2023 smash hit single “Flowers.

” The song, which quickly became a global sensation and earned Miley multiple prestigious awards, is now the subject of a copyright infringement lawsuit filed by Tempo Music Investments.

Miley Cyrus talks medical condition that causes her raspy voice
This lawsuit alleges that “Flowers” unlawfully borrows key musical elements from Bruno Mars’s 2013 hit “When I Was Your Man.

” The case has drawn widespread attention, raising important questions about music copyright, creativity, and the boundaries between inspiration and infringement.

Tempo Music Investments, a company that owns a portion of the U.S.copyrights to “When I Was Your Man,” initiated the lawsuit against Miley Cyrus and several other defendants.

The company acquired these rights from Philip Lawrence, one of the co-writers of the Bruno Mars song.

Notably, Bruno Mars himself is not a plaintiff in this case, which focuses on the ownership of copyright rather than the artist directly.

The lawsuit accuses Miley’s team of unauthorized exploitation of several musical elements from “When I Was Your Man.

” Specifically, Tempo Music claims that “Flowers” copies melodic pitch design, the sequence of verses, the connecting bassline, certain bars of the chorus, and specific chord progressions.

According to the complaint, these similarities are too significant to be coincidental, and the success of “Flowers” depends heavily on these borrowed elements.

Miley Cyrus tiết lộ không muốn đi lưu diễn trong tương lai

The core of the lawsuit revolves around the musical structure and composition of “Flowers.

” Tempo Music Investments argues that the melodic and harmonic components of Miley’s song closely mirror those in Bruno Mars’s track.

This includes the pitch design — how the melody moves up and down — and the sequence of the verse, which allegedly follows a pattern similar to that of “When I Was Your Man.”

Additionally, the bassline that connects parts of the song, certain bars in the chorus, and the chord progressions are also cited as nearly identical.

These elements, according to the lawsuit, are fundamental to the unique sound and feel of “When I Was Your Man,” and their replication in “Flowers” constitutes infringement.

Besides Miley Cyrus herself, the lawsuit names several companies involved in the distribution of “Flowers.

” These include Sony Music Publishing, Apple, Target, Walmart, and others.

By including these entities, Tempo Music seeks to hold accountable all parties responsible for reproducing, distributing, or publicly performing the allegedly infringing song.

Miley Cyrus - Nghệ sĩ có màn trở lại hoành tráng nhất năm 2023

This broad approach is common in copyright lawsuits, as it aims to cover the entire chain of commercial exploitation of the contested work.

If successful, the plaintiffs could potentially stop the sale and streaming of “Flowers” through these platforms.

Miley Cyrus has not yet issued a public statement regarding the lawsuit.

However, this is not the first time she has faced legal challenges related to her music.

In fact, this marks the fourth time that Miley has been sued for copyright infringement.

Each case brings increased scrutiny and higher stakes, especially given the commercial and critical success of “Flowers.”

Released as the lead single from Miley’s eighth studio album *Endless Summer Vacation*, “Flowers” quickly became one of her biggest hits.

It topped charts worldwide and held the number one position on the Billboard Hot 100 for eight consecutive weeks.

Miley Cyrus Hospitalized with a 'Disintegrating' Knee. Here's Why the Doctor Said 'Yuck'
The song’s themes of self-empowerment and independence, particularly following Miley’s highly publicized divorce from actor Liam Hemsworth, resonated with millions of listeners.

Interestingly, fans and commentators have noted a lyrical and thematic contrast between “Flowers” and “When I Was Your Man.

” Bruno Mars’s song expresses regret and sorrow over lost love, with lyrics about missed opportunities such as not buying flowers or holding hands.

In contrast, Miley’s “Flowers” is widely interpreted as a declaration of self-love and moving on after heartbreak.

Some fans have even speculated that Liam Hemsworth once dedicated “When I Was Your Man” to Miley, adding a layer of personal intrigue to the lawsuit.

This emotional backdrop has fueled public interest in the case, as the songs seem to represent two sides of a personal story — one of regret and one of empowerment.

Tempo Music Investments is seeking damages, the amount of which will be determined at trial, and a court order to prohibit Miley and the other defendants from reproducing, distributing, or performing “Flowers.

” Such an injunction could have significant implications for Miley’s career, potentially limiting her ability to perform or monetize one of her most successful songs.

Miley Cyrus Has No "Desire" To Tour Again Saying "There's No Connection" In "Singing For Hundreds Of Thousands Of People"

Beyond the individual impact on Miley Cyrus, this lawsuit highlights ongoing challenges in the music industry regarding copyright protection.

Determining where inspiration ends and infringement begins is often complex, especially in genres like pop music where certain chord progressions and melodic patterns are commonly used.

Cases like this could influence how artists and producers approach songwriting and how copyright laws are interpreted in the digital age.

The lawsuit has sparked debate among fans, musicians, and legal experts.

Some argue that the similarities between “Flowers” and “When I Was Your Man” are coincidental or fall within acceptable boundaries of musical influence.

Others believe the case raises valid concerns about protecting original compositions and the rights of songwriters.

Social media platforms and forums have been buzzing with discussions about the musical elements in question.

Miley Cyrus on Sobriety and Working Out in Heels
Many listeners are comparing the two songs, analyzing melodies, chords, and lyrics to form their own opinions.

This public engagement reflects the broader cultural significance of such legal disputes in the entertainment world.

Miley Cyrus’s hit single “Flowers” has become more than just a chart-topping anthem; it is now at the heart of a high-profile copyright lawsuit.

Tempo Music Investments’ claims that the song unlawfully borrows from Bruno Mars’s “When I Was Your Man” raise important questions about creativity, ownership, and the legal protections afforded to artists.

As the case progresses, it will be closely watched by the music industry and fans alike, with potential ramifications for how music is created and shared in the future.

While Miley has yet to respond publicly, the outcome of this lawsuit could shape her career and influence the broader conversation about artistic originality.

For now, “Flowers” remains a powerful symbol of independence and resilience — a song that has touched millions but now faces a challenging legal battle over its origins.