Meghan Markle’s recent appearance at the Balenciaga fashion show in Paris has ignited a storm of criticism and controversy, not just for her unconventional outfit but for the broader implications surrounding her choices and public persona.

The Duchess of Sussex, known for her high-profile exit from the British royal family and ongoing media scrutiny, was spotted at the Paris event wearing an outfit that many have described as bizarre and unflattering—drawing comparisons to everything from “grandma’s pajamas” to a “ghost Halloween costume.

” Beyond the fashion faux pas, her presence at the show raises questions about her priorities, principles, and the complicated relationship she maintains with the UK and the royal family.

 

The outfit Meghan wore to the Balenciaga show baffled many fashion observers and fans alike.

Described as resembling a white pillow cover or ill-fitting pajamas, the ensemble was widely panned as one of her worst fashion choices to date.

Critics noted the mismatched whites and the oversized, shapeless silhouette that did little to flatter her slender frame.

Some even likened it to a papal or ghost costume, highlighting how far removed it was from typical high-fashion glamour.

 

Despite the negative reception, Meghan appeared to embrace the look with confidence, strutting through the venue with what some described as a “Zoolander-esque” runway walk—awkward yet determined.

Videos posted on social media showed her striking poses and throwing kisses, but the overall impression was one of discomfort and forced sophistication.

Observers noted that Meghan’s usual bright smile was replaced with a more stoic, almost dead-eyed expression, fueling speculation about her state of mind and authenticity.

 

Meghan’s attendance at the Balenciaga show was officially in support of Pira Palo Peloio, the brand’s new creative director who recently took over from previous leadership.

This marked Meghan’s first time back at a major fashion show in over a decade, and the invitation itself was reportedly orchestrated by the brand’s desire for the publicity her presence would generate.

However, Balenciaga is no stranger to controversy.

Just a few years ago, the fashion house faced widespread backlash for an ad campaign featuring children alongside BDSM-themed imagery—a scandal that deeply unsettled many consumers and critics.

This controversy stands in stark contrast to Meghan’s public advocacy for child safety and online protection, leading to accusations of hypocrisy.

Critics argue that her support for Balenciaga undermines her stated principles, suggesting that she prioritizes fame and financial gain over genuine causes.

 

One of the most pointed criticisms leveled against Meghan is the perceived hypocrisy in her public statements versus her actions.

While she has repeatedly expressed concerns about the safety and well-being of children online, her willingness to associate with a brand recently embroiled in a child-related scandal raises eyebrows.

Moreover, Meghan’s refusal to return to the UK with her children—citing safety concerns—while freely traveling to high-profile events like the Paris fashion show, adds another layer of contradiction.

 

This perceived double standard has fueled skepticism about Meghan’s motives.

Many commentators suggest that her decisions are driven more by self-interest, publicity, and financial incentives than by genuine concern for family or principles.

The fact that she is willing to be surrounded by strangers and security personnel in Paris but avoids the UK altogether is seen by some as evidence of a desire to control her narrative and maintain center-stage attention.

 

Meghan’s appearance at the Balenciaga show also highlights the challenges she faces in sustaining her public image and career post-royalty.

Since stepping back from royal duties, she and Prince Harry have pursued various media and philanthropic ventures, but many have struggled to gain traction.

Her podcast, television projects, and brand endorsements have often been met with lukewarm reception or outright failure.

 

Fashion appearances like the Balenciaga show seem to serve as attempts to remain relevant and in the public eye, but they come with risks.

The outfit choice and the awkwardness of her runway walk have been widely mocked, reinforcing a narrative that Meghan is out of her depth in the high-fashion world.

Comparisons to established fashion figures like Beatrice Borromeo and Charlotte Casiraghi—who carry aristocratic backgrounds and exude effortless confidence—only emphasize Meghan’s struggle to find her footing.

 

The Balenciaga event also underscores the complex interplay between Meghan’s public image and media strategy.

Some analysts believe that the brand invited her primarily to capitalize on the attention she generates, regardless of whether it is positive or negative.

Meghan’s presence guarantees headlines, social media buzz, and increased visibility for the fashion house, which may be recovering from past controversies.

 

At the same time, Meghan’s team appears to be using such appearances to craft a new persona—one that blends celebrity, influencer, and fashion icon.

However, this reinvention is met with mixed reactions.

While some admire her ambition and resilience, others see it as a series of missteps fueled by desperation for fame and approval.

 

Beyond fashion and media, Meghan’s choices have significant implications for her personal life and relationships.

Her refusal to return to the UK has been a source of tension within the royal family, particularly with Prince Harry’s father, Prince Charles, and other members.

Critics argue that her stance has caused emotional damage to family bonds and hindered efforts at reconciliation.

 

Speculation about Meghan’s relationship with Harry also surfaced during the fashion show coverage, with some suggesting that her companion, Marcus Anderson, plays a significant role in their dynamic.

This adds to the public fascination and scrutiny around the couple’s private lives, often overshadowing their public endeavors.

 

Some observers draw parallels between Meghan’s experiences and those of Princess Diana, noting deliberate references such as Meghan reportedly wearing Diana’s favorite perfume on her first date with Harry.

However, critics caution that attempts to recreate Diana’s narrative may fuel paranoia and complicate Harry’s relationship with his family further.

The tragic death of Diana in Paris is a poignant backdrop to Meghan’s appearance in the same city, leading to speculation about whether Meghan’s presence there is symbolic or strategic.

This comparison evokes strong emotions and adds a layer of complexity to public perceptions of Meghan’s role within the royal saga.

 

Meghan Markle’s appearance at the Balenciaga fashion show is emblematic of the contradictions and controversies that have come to define her public life.

From fashion missteps to questions about her principles and family loyalties, Meghan continues to be a polarizing figure.

While she seeks to carve out a new identity beyond royalty, her efforts are met with both fascination and criticism.

 

Her Balenciaga outfit may have been laughable to some, but it symbolizes a deeper struggle for relevance, authenticity, and acceptance in a world that watches her every move.

Whether Meghan can navigate these challenges successfully remains to be seen, but one thing is clear: her story is far from over, and the spotlight will continue to follow her, for better or worse.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.