Meyers mocked Trump’s firing of U.S. attorney Erik Siebert and his demand for prosecutions of political opponents, framing it as an abuse of power fueled by personal vendettas.

In a striking segment on “Late Night with Seth Meyers,” host Seth Meyers tackled the controversial remarks made by former President

Donald Trump regarding his ongoing campaign against perceived political enemies and his threats against television networks that criticize him.

The episode aired on September 23, 2025, and it featured Meyers’ signature blend of humor and sharp political commentary as he dissected Trump’s alarming calls for retribution against those he views as adversaries.

The segment opened with Meyers addressing Trump’s recent social media posts, where he publicly urged his attorney general, Pam Bondi, to initiate prosecutions against his political opponents.

Meyers, with his characteristic wit, questioned whether such actions were in line with the principles of justice and democracy.

“Is that what’s killing our credibility and reputation?” he quipped, referring to Trump’s focus on silencing dissent rather than addressing pressing issues like inflation and the economy.

Meyers pointed out that Trump’s desire to prosecute his opponents is not a new phenomenon. He recalled how, during Trump’s first term, the former president openly expressed frustration over his inability to take legal action against those he deemed threats.

“He wanted to prosecute his political opponents but couldn’t,” Meyers remarked, emphasizing the lengths to which Trump would go to seek revenge.

The host humorously imagined a scenario where Trump’s loyalists were more concerned with plotting retribution than addressing real issues like rising grocery prices.

As Meyers delved deeper into the topic, he highlighted Trump’s tendency to scapegoat those who fail to align with his agenda.

The comedian referenced Trump’s recent decision to oust Erik Siebert, the U.S. attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia, after Siebert’s investigation into New York Attorney General Letitia James yielded no evidence of wrongdoing.

Meyers noted, “Trump was mad because the guy he hand-picked couldn’t find evidence to charge New York’s attorney general with a crime.”

This decision, according to Meyers, demonstrates Trump’s willingness to sacrifice the integrity of the Justice Department for personal vendettas.

Meyers also addressed Trump’s peculiar rationale for firing Siebert, which was based on the prosecutor receiving “strong support” from Democratic senators.

“The president said he fired one of his own appointees because he got too much support from Democrats,” Meyers pointed out, incredulously. The absurdity of this reasoning was not lost on the audience, who responded with laughter.

In a particularly poignant moment, Meyers drew attention to the broader implications of Trump’s rhetoric. He asserted that Trump’s public call for prosecutions against his enemies represents a dangerous erosion of democratic norms.

“It’s bad when Trump does it, and it would have been bad if Joe Biden had done it,” Meyers stated, underscoring the importance of holding leaders accountable for their actions, regardless of their political affiliation.

The segment took a humorous turn as Meyers recounted his experiences with political humor and the inevitable backlash that comes with it.

He recalled a time when he hosted the White House Correspondents’ Dinner and received criticism from Trump, who famously claimed Meyers had “marbles in his mouth.”

With a laugh, Meyers countered, “No, I didn’t like it. Mainly because I don’t have marbles in my mouth. I have them in a jar,” poking fun at the absurdity of the criticism he faced.

As the segment progressed, Meyers highlighted the hypocrisy of Trump’s claims regarding free speech. The former president has repeatedly suggested that negative coverage from the media equates to a violation of free speech rights.

“No, that is free speech,” Meyers asserted, emphasizing that criticism is a fundamental aspect of a democratic society. He pointed out that making jokes about powerful figures is not only expected but necessary in a healthy political discourse.

Meyers also addressed the backlash Trump has faced from both Democrats and conservatives regarding his attempts to stifle dissent.

He noted that even Texas Republican Senator Ted Cruz condemned Trump’s threats against late-night comedy shows, calling them “dangerous as hell.”

This bipartisan criticism highlights the growing concern among lawmakers about the implications of Trump’s rhetoric on free speech and democratic principles.

In a climactic moment, Meyers celebrated the return of his fellow comedian, Jimmy Kimmel, to the airwaves after a brief suspension due to Trump’s pressure on network executives.

The audience erupted in applause as Meyers declared, “There has been a massive national backlash to Trump’s crackdown on free speech, even among conservatives.”

This sentiment resonated with viewers who are increasingly alarmed by the implications of Trump’s actions on the fabric of American democracy.

Meyers concluded the segment with a reminder of the importance of holding leaders accountable for their actions and the necessity of a free press in a democratic society.

“If the president should be dictating what TV hosts can and can’t say, you’d get about 3% positive and 97% negative,” he quipped, reinforcing the idea that the public will not stand for censorship and political retribution.

In this episode of “Late Night with Seth Meyers,” the host effectively captured the essence of the ongoing political turmoil in America, using humor to shed light on serious issues surrounding free speech, political accountability, and the dangers of authoritarianism.

As the nation grapples with the ramifications of Trump’s actions, Meyers’ commentary serves as a reminder of the critical role that comedy and satire play in fostering political discourse and holding those in power accountable.