Fascinating reason it’s taking 17 hours to bring home stranded astronauts despite 3.5 hours travel time for Russian cosmonautsFascinating reason it’s taking 17 hours to bring home stranded astronauts despite 3.5 hours travel time for Russian cosmonauts

The explanation behind it all isn’t what you might expect

While it might not seem too strange that it’s taking NASA 17 hours to return stranded astronauts Suni Williams and Butch Wilmore back to Earth, comparisons to a previous Russian Soyuz capsule that took just 3.5 hours for the ‘same’ journey have many asking questions.

What’s almost guaranteed though is that the 17-hour journey will go by in a flash for Williams and Wilmore, who have been ‘stuck’ on board the International Space Station (ISS) for 285 days now, despite their expected stay being just eight days.

After technical issues arose with both their Boeing Starliner spacecraft and the SpaceX rocket that was scheduled to bring them back, the pair are finally on their way back home after the unexpected delay in space.

Advert

It'll take the SpaceX Crew Dragon around 17 hours to return from the ISS back to Earth (NASA)It'll take the SpaceX Crew Dragon around 17 hours to return from the ISS back to Earth (NASA)

It’ll take the SpaceX Crew Dragon around 17 hours to return from the ISS back to Earth (NASA)

SpaceX’s Crew Dragon spacecraft departed from the ISS at 1:05 a.m. EST today, after the Crew-10 astronauts successfully completed their handover process, allowing the stranded pair to make their way back to Earth.

NASA have officially confirmed the time that they’re expected to splash into the ocean off the coast of Florida, and it’s just a few minutes shy of 17 hours.

However, as reported by the Economic Times, a Russian Soyuz capsule last year managed to do what is essentially the same journey in just 3.5 hours, cutting down the travel time by roughly 80%, but the reason behind the wild difference is fascinating.

Advert

Returning from the International Space Station – or frankly anywhere in space – is a complicated and dangerous process, and thus a number of different variables have to be considered by scientists behind the missions.

First and foremost, their SpaceX craft must slow down enough from the ISS’ 28,000 km/h orbit of the Earth in order to drop out of it, but this becomes challenging when you’re trying to land in a very specific place.

On top of this, the ideal landing spots can be required to change at any moment due to shifts in weather, ocean currents, and the location of recovery ships, and thus rushing into things is probably the worst thing you can do to ensure the safety of the astronauts on board.

Spacecrafts also experience extreme temperatures as they break through the atmosphere which are caused by air resistance, so the flights are slowed down through the use of parachutes to ensure that things don’t get too hot.

Advert

Once everything has gone to plan the spacecraft is then ready to land into the sea, but in the case of the Soyuz capsule it took a more direct route towards Earth, disregarding many of the controlling and safety measures put in place by NASA and SpaceX.

The Soyuz MS-26 took just 3.5 hours to return from the ISS to Earth (NASA)The Soyuz MS-26 took just 3.5 hours to return from the ISS to Earth (NASA)

The Soyuz MS-26 took just 3.5 hours to return from the ISS to Earth (NASA)

This is slightly more dangerous, and is undoubtedly a more uncomfortable experience for the astronauts on board, but as you can see in the vast difference in times it does make the whole process a lot quicker.

Based on the ISS altitude of around 420 km (261 miles), the Crew Dragon capsule would have to travel at 15 miles per hour to do the journey in 17 hours, whereas the Soyuz capsule would be at around 75 miles per hour.

Featured Image Credit: Joe Raedle / Staff / Getty

Advert

Advert

Advert

Insane amount of money it likely cost SpaceX to launch rescue crew to ISS for 'stranded' NASA astronautsInsane amount of money it likely cost SpaceX to launch rescue crew to ISS for 'stranded' NASA astronauts

Insane amount of money it likely cost SpaceX to launch rescue crew to ISS for ‘stranded’ NASA astronauts

Launching a rocket isn’t cheap

The end is finally in sight.

The Falcon 9 successfully lifted off from Kennedy Space Center in Florida at 7:04 p.m. EDT on Friday (14 March), marking the long-awaited rescue mission for NASA astronauts Barry ‘Butch’ Wilmore and Sunita ‘Suni’ Williams.

Onboard the Dragon capsule are Crew-10’s four astronauts: NASA’s Nichole Ayers and Anne McClain, Roscosmos astronaut Kirill Peskov, and Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency’s Takuya Onishi.

Advert

Following a couple of days handover, Williams and Wilmore are due back on Earth after an unexpectedly long mission.

The Falcon 9 blasted off on Friday. NurPhoto / Contributor / GettyThe Falcon 9 blasted off on Friday. NurPhoto / Contributor / Getty

The Falcon 9 blasted off on Friday. NurPhoto / Contributor / Getty

SpaceX had originally planned to launch the Falcon 9 rocket and Dragon spacecraft in February before being pushed back until March.

Both missions were aborted last minute due to technical issues with the rocket’s clamp arm and hydraulics of the launch tower, respectively.

Advert

However, third time lucky, everything went as planned as many watched the Falcon 9 blast off on Friday.

Wilmore and Williams are to be transported home with another American astronaut and a Russian cosmonaut aboard a SpaceX Crew Dragon craft, which arrived at the ISS early on Sunday.

Now that Wilmore and Williams are finally heading home, you might be wondering – how much did this mission actually cost?

Getting to orbit has become more cost-efficient over the years, thanks to reusable rockets and advancements in spaceflight technology. However, when human passengers are involved, things get considerably more expensive.

Advert

Turns out, according to Wikipedia, standard Falcon 9 launch costs around $69.75 million as of 2024.

Williams and Wilmore have been stranded on the ISS for over nine months. MIGUEL J. RODRIGUEZ CARRILLO / Contributor / Getty