“DEFAMED & FRAMED!” Donald Trump Files BOMBSHELL Lawsuit Against Murdoch, WSJ Journalists in Shocking Epstein Cover-Up Scandal

On July 18, 2025, former President Donald J. Trump ignited a media and political firestorm by filing a bombshell lawsuit against Rupert Murdoch, the Wall Street Journal, two of its journalists, Dow Jones & Company, and News Corp.

The explosive legal action accuses the media conglomerate and its top executives of defamation, libel, and slander connected to allegations regarding Jeffrey Epstein.

In the complaint filed in federal court, Trump’s legal team asserts that the defendants conspired to publish knowingly false information designed to damage his public image, undermine his 2024 campaign legacy, and link him to Epstein in an “orchestrated smear campaign. ”

The lawsuit claims that recent Wall Street Journal reporting, allegedly backed by selectively leaked or mischaracterized documents, portrayed Trump as having deeper ties to Epstein’s illicit activities than publicly known.

Trump’s lawyers say the articles misrepresented confidential grand jury testimony that has not yet been unsealed and that the timing of the publication—days before a critical hearing on the Epstein grand jury records—was “deliberate, malicious, and politically motivated. ”

Trump seeks unspecified damages for reputational harm, loss of future political opportunity, and emotional distress, calling the Journal’s reporting “journalistic arson in service of political warfare. ”

In a statement posted to Truth Social just hours after the filing, Trump declared, “I will not stand by while corrupt media giants smear my name with lies and filthy innuendo.

Rupert Murdoch and his fake news puppets at the Wall Street Journal have crossed a line they cannot uncross.

This is about truth, justice, and fighting for what’s right. ”

He added, “They think they can tie me to Epstein without facts.

I never visited his island.

I never flew on his plane.

And I certainly was never part of his sick world.

They know this—but they push the lie anyway. ”

Representatives for Rupert Murdoch and the Wall Street Journal have declined to comment on the pending litigation.

A brief statement from News Corp referred to the suit as “baseless, inflammatory, and a flagrant attempt to intimidate a free press.

” However, inside sources have revealed growing concern among WSJ editorial staff, with some employees calling emergency legal consultations to determine whether internal communications could be subpoenaed.

Meanwhile, the reporters named in the suit—whose bylines appeared in a recent exposé tying Epstein’s secret guest logs to several high-profile figures—have reportedly gone dark on social media following online threats from Trump supporters.

This lawsuit lands amid a renewed wave of public interest in the Epstein saga.

Last month, a federal judge ordered the partial unsealing of grand jury transcripts involving Epstein’s former associates and high-profile visitors to his properties.

While Trump’s name has not been officially confirmed in any of the unsealed documents, speculation has surged online, fueled by partisan blogs and social media accounts citing “anonymous insiders.

” Trump’s attorneys argue that the Journal “intentionally blurred the line between fact and fantasy,” leveraging speculation to craft a narrative they claim was never supported by credible evidence.

The political implications are profound.

Trump’s legal strike could upend the fragile détente between the former president and conservative-leaning media outlets that once championed his rise.

Though Murdoch-owned properties like Fox News and the New York Post initially backed Trump in 2016 and 2020, relations have cooled in recent years, especially after the January 6 Capitol riot and Trump’s relentless election denial.

Media analysts now speculate this lawsuit could mark a formal and permanent break between Trump and the Murdoch empire.

Some even suggest that Trump may be positioning himself to launch or buy a competing media network if he secures damages or a legal victory.

Supporters have rallied quickly around Trump’s legal crusade, flooding social platforms with hashtags like #SueTheMedia and #TrumpVsMurdoch.

Right-wing influencers and commentators have framed the suit as a David-and-Goliath battle between a populist leader and an entrenched media elite.

“This isn’t just a lawsuit.

It’s a war declaration,” tweeted one conservative pundit.

“Trump is taking on the globalist press cartel, and he’s not backing down.

” Others warned of dangerous precedent, with press freedom advocates expressing concern that litigation could be weaponized to silence legitimate journalism.

Legal experts are divided.

Some argue Trump’s case may face steep hurdles given the high bar for defamation cases involving public figures.

Under U. S. law, Trump must prove “actual malice”—that the defendants knowingly published false information or acted with reckless disregard for the truth.

However, others believe the sheer magnitude of the media coverage, the potentially false implications, and the political context could give Trump’s team ammunition in court.

If the case proceeds to discovery, it could force Murdoch’s empire to turn over internal communications and editorial decisions, exposing how Epstein-related reporting was constructed and approved.

The lawsuit’s impact on Trump’s political future remains uncertain.

While he is no longer president, Trump remains the most influential figure in the Republican Party and a vocal kingmaker heading into the 2026 midterms.

Allies say the lawsuit is not about publicity or ego—but about accountability and clearing his name.

“Donald Trump doesn’t sue unless he’s serious,” said one former White House aide.

“He’s going after the media machine that’s tried to destroy him for years.

And this time, he’s going for the jugular. ”

As the legal battle unfolds, one thing is certain: the already fraying relationship between Trump and the media establishment has now erupted into full-scale warfare.

Whether Trump’s lawsuit leads to courtroom vindication or becomes yet another chapter in his unrelenting conflict with the press, the ripple effects will echo across political, media, and legal circles for years to come.

In a case where reputations, legacies, and power structures are all on the line, the truth may not just be stranger than fiction—it may also be far more dangerous.